Why the Government will NEVER Admit to Existence of Extra Terrestrials.

reply to post by EricD


Well, it sounds like your arguing the point of the gov't not having any Top Secret info about aliens/ufos.

To be honest with you, I would probably disagree with that point, but that is not the cause of the thread. I do admit that the scenario you're suggesting is possible. The gov't might not know any more about the subject than the general public, but if they did, my point is that they wouldn't come forward with it because it would cost the people at the top, the very top, money.

Why do people think the elite ones know all about ufo's they know nothing the proof is in the pudding, if there are aliens millions or billions of years more advanced than us than why the hell would they listen bush or blair, would they listen you, I personally think if there are aliens, I reckon there are many species from different parts of the universe or beyond, many are capable of reaching are planet through different forms of travel, and my point is that if one of these species came to are planet they will just fly and land wherever they want whenever they want, and you will know all about in HD, instead of the same instantly debunked shakey hand cam footage, if aliens can bounce around the universe or beyond im sure they have some nice weapons to, in-case they encounter any hostiles like bush and his gang yeah I have seen loads of alien footage but there is something about all of the films eeh where the f is alien



[edit on 27-10-2007 by MESSYSC]

reply to post by MESSYSC


The point was, as I've stated, IF the gov't did have Top Secret info about aliens, they wouldn't come out with it.

Also, as far as the elite go, I think it only makes sense that if the gov't knows, they would know as well. They lend $$ to the gov't, they have ties in controlling it, and it's people. They are at the TOP of the food chain, so how could they NOT share the info?

reply to post by bigbert81


Thats an interesting thought. I dont know to much about this stuff really, but I guess that's why I'm here! Here, I found this website to. www.thetruthseeker.co.uk... I thought it might help.

The Vatican was built on the foundations of evil.

Excerpt from Wikipedia - The Lateran Treaty

"The Lateran Treaty is one of the Lateran Pacts of 1929 or Lateran Accords, three agreements made in 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See, ratified June 7, 1929, ending the "Roman Question".
They consisted of three documents:

A political treaty recognizing the full sovereignty of the Holy See in the State of Vatican City, which was thereby established.

A concordat regulating the position of the Catholic Church and the Catholic religion in the Italian state.

A financial convention agreed on as a definitive settlement of the claims of the Holy See following the losses of its territories and property."


All the priceless historical artifacts they have locked up is disgusting.

And this is an Excerpt from - www.chick.com...

"Remember when the pope came to the United States? How he chided us for not showing mercy? That we should give away what we have to the poor? We are such a wealthy nation. And then remember the great earthquake that took place in 1980 over in Italy? I remember when the pope came in to this ruined area, walked up to the bedside of some poor little wounded Italian man and the pope so benevolently laid his hand on his head and made the sign of the cross, blessed the man and walked off.

And the newscasters were telling of the devastation. And then we cut back to the United States and Senator Kennedy looked at the camera with sorrowful eyes and said, "Oh, we Americans, out of mercy we should send at least 45 million dollars to this devastated village so we can reconstruct it." Remember that? Now let me read something out of THE VATICAN BILLIONS by Avro Manhattan, and I think you're going to get as mad as I am right now. I want to bring to your attention the fact that this information was published 10 years ago, and the figures are probably even more startling today.

"The Vatican has large investments with the Rothschilds of Britain, France and America, with the Hambros Bank, with the Credit Suisse in London and Zurich. In the United States it has large investments with the Morgan Bank, the Chase-Manhattan Bank, the First National Bank of New York, the Bankers Trust Company, and others. The Vatican has billions of shares in the most powerful international corporations such as Gulf Oil, Shell, General Motors, Bethlehem Steel, General Electric, International Business Machines, T.W.A., etc. At a conservative estimate, these amount to more than 500 million dollars in the U.S.A. alone.

"In a statement published in connection with a bond prospectus, the Boston archdiocese listed its assets at Six Hundred and Thirty-five Million ($635,891,004), which is 9.9 times its liabilities. This leaves a net worth of Five Hundred and Seventy-one million dollars ($571,704,953). It is not difficult to discover the truly astonishing wealth of the church, once we add the riches of the twenty-eight archdioceses and 122 dioceses of the U.S.A., some of which are even wealthier than that of Boston."


I am pretty sure that god would want to use all that money for the good of mankind but obviously the holy see is contempt with riding the stock market.

Originally posted by Mammoth
Wait, question: Why would the existence of extra-terrestials mean the end of the bible and religion? Just because it talks about our creation that does not mean other outside species dont exist...

Unless that outside species has been in communication with the government for a while and told them such things as 'we created life on this and many other worlds' and could prove it. I do not believe that is the case but it would certainly serve to let a lot of hot air out of the religion balloon. Why there wouldn't be enough air left to make a good balloon dog in spite of a few die-hard cultists frantic huffing and puffing.

reply to post by xion329alpha


Yes, it seems they would rather keep the money and invest it to make more, than completely rid the world of deadly water, or several other problems.

Maybe they're worried they won't get any more contributions from people?

This is a BUSINESS. A damn good one at that. And to bring something forth which would cut into profits I don't particularly see happening.