It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Reptilian Paul McCartney & Hillary Clinton

page: 3
7
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 11:42 AM
link   
I don't know his name, I saw a posting about him about a month ago. Look him up, he exists and I don't know why he ain't posting in some of these....

....also, if ATS "were to become a mainstream site" -- ??? What? Like it isn't one already? Tens of thousands of hits on individual threads seems more then mainstream to me dude.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Careful MM or Paul McCartney is going to eat you!


I seen it happen once, I took a pic with my phone, but its not suitable for ATS.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 11:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by InSpiteOf
To Novus:
I dont think we need to cut these threads off ATS, the fact that the majority of the membership rips these threads to shreds is a testiment to the will of ATS.


Point taken

I still think these threads are pointless and a waste of time, though


The assertion of reptilians is just dumb, in my mind, and I believe a lot of out there things.

Oh well. I'm with you and MM on this. This is my last post in these threads



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Dam I love these threads I need a bit Humour in between all the doom and gloom.

Long live the Shape Shifting Reptilians.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 12:02 PM
link   
.... sort of on that topic of "I can't believe" this and that. This is a site that gets a lot, I mean, many hits in the Aliens & UFOs forum, whereas 'this' subject gets slammed time and again.

My question: people seem to turn into peer pressure junkies on this site and in general -- "little Greys" are believable?! Strieber is a credible author but Icke isn't?

This is what I don't get about some people. They are willing to believe something like SPACESHIPS and little aliens but 'people' that you know,
have seen in the media, who knows, probably people like you or I who
read this site and normally walk down a street, cannot be 'superhuman'
or reptilian (for the threads' topic sake)? Heck, w/ the slit eyes they could be
"cat people" for all we know.

Letting the imagination run wild is what makes humans so special, also,
our creativity is what separates us from animals -- we can build. Believing
something, that at present, is not-provable, is where speculation theories and the likes take over.

It doesn't take much for a mind to wander a little further into an abyss where you (the reader) or I don't really know what goes on behind closed doors -- at that point, we're less then spectators in a postmodern age.



[edit on 16-10-2007 by anhinga]

[edit on 16-10-2007 by anhinga]



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 12:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by InSpiteOf
There is one good question that has not been answered by the likes of CanadianVandal and Meatclown


and more than likely will never be. Instead Im being told I have mental issues because I cant see what they see.

Maybe Ill post it again and see if it gets their attention.



Originally posted by me
How come Hillary only transforms on compressed youtube footage.... but never infront of network television cameras being broadcast live around the world???




Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
PLEASE SHUT THEM OUT FROM THIS WEBSITE


I think ATS Skunk Works is the perfect place to post this kind of stuff. I just dont think they should post easily refuted video claiming to be "Undeniable Proof" and then being allowed to brand people with a differing opinion as having mental issues. Mods should look into this.



Originally posted by anhinga
I don't know his name


You cite him as supporting your argument and being an expert in a field you obviously believe heavily in, and you dont know his name. Then you suggest we look him up. How? Based on what you gave us it could be you for all we know.

____________________________________________________________

The whole premise of reptilian shape shifter overlords who secretly control the world is something that makes a mockery of conspiracy theorists everywhere. Until some evidence is provided it will continue to remain so.

To CanadianVandal:

What you have posted here is nothing. Go find some high res footage of Hillary with scales eating a rodent. Untill then, stop wasting valuable ATS server space.

CT



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 12:59 PM
link   
The server space is being wasted by people telling other people what to do, aside from the fact that 'freedom' still means something, like what Druggie Jr preaches about the next US state -- Iraq.... I am not the expert, I know it wasn't a dream, I will look him up.....

Lastly, (probably not) fitting into others idea, (stress idea) of what
the definition of a conspiracy theory is, I can't see how people
waste their time posting, let alone deciding they're right is no different
then the endless JFK stuff when it's clear the driver killed him. UFOs,
unless someone is on a blackberry/mobile w/ camera and like, "Uh, I'm in a spaceship" or the things freaking land here, can't be proven.

I notice there's already over 500 hits for this post and obviously not that
many have posted, so maybe put two and two together and leave people
to research/post what THEY so desire.



[edit on 16-10-2007 by anhinga]



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 01:30 PM
link   
Paul Mcartney -- just a englishman with his counries notorious.. BAD TEETH!

You may wanna start filming the Geico lizzard. I see no concrete evidence -- at all.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 01:33 PM
link   
I was wondering, are all these reptillians from the same family?

I mean you now have Sir Paul Mcartney, Hillary, bush, the queen, tony blair?

what are all these reptillians doing here on planet earth?

If there are so many of them, why do we still have a problem with rats?

I thought they ate rats and things?

If anyone's got the answer, I'd like to know.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 01:42 PM
link   
Wait.... what am I doing in here again? Oh yeah, laughing my butt off.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 01:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Level X
Paul Mcartney -- just a englishman with his counries notorious.. BAD TEETH!

You may wanna start filming the Geico lizzard. I see no concrete evidence -- at all.


Not all British have bad teeth it's just that us British don't Whitewash our teeth like the Americans do. It's normal to have a stupid fake looking Hollywood smile in the USA.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by anhinga
 



Their is a difference between researching, and watching/making youtube videos...


Why won't anyone get it through their heads that youtube is the LAST THING you want to cite as video evidence.

Chances are people find these videos on youtube, edit them to highlight the fangs and eyes (zoom in, slow down) and repost them on youtube, causing probably more quality loss.


You want people to start seeing the obivious?


Post a original video file on a file sharing site.

Filefront
Fileshack
Rapidshare

Pick one and put the large video there. I have accounts on Filefront and Rapid share. I will gladly download them, regardless of size. And i will get screen shots for everyone to see who doesn't want to download them. Only then will this be taken seriously by anyone. If you cannot find a high resolution video of this "shapeshifting" Then regardless if the reptilian is real or not, noone will take it seriously or look at it as viable evidence.

John Rhodes is making a thread/article on why these "slit eyes" look as they do. He was in film for a while and now how they light people for the camera.


I issue a challenge/help to anyone out there.

Find someone's youtube blog video or someone unknown/little known talking to a camera with some sort of lights on them. Lets see how many reptillians we find.










Josh

[edit on 10/16/2007 by 3rdeye]

[edit on 10/16/2007 by 3rdeye]



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by InSpiteOf
 


Check out some of her videos on CNN. They are taken from live footage. You can see her eyes shifting from time to time.

I have personally seen this on live television myself. Maybe you arn't looking hard enough?



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 03:34 PM
link   
Love how nobody, not even the proclaimed scientific skeptics, have even attempted to offer an explanation for her finger changing shape, size and color then changing back.

compression for sure



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 03:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Meatclown
 


Motion Blur my friend. enhanced by the compression and loss of youtube videos.


Reason nobody has given a explanation is the quality of the evidence is low.

As i said in my previous post. Youtube is the last resort for "video analysis"

[edit on 10/16/2007 by 3rdeye]



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 03:54 PM
link   
HEE HEE!
Gosh darn it, I knew she was a biatch errrr.....snake!!!!!!!!!!!!
Poor old Paul, you'd think with all that money, he could afford a good dentist!



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 03:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Meatclown
 


So how's this different from any other politician? They're all shifty!





posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 04:01 PM
link   
reply to post by 3rdeye
 


There was no motion-blur in the hilllary video during the time of her hand shifting. Her hand and arm was in a fixed position. Good try though.


Attacking youtube won't help your case either. While compression is an issue, it doesn't distort video in the way seen in this video.



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 04:02 PM
link   
Just wanted to post these links: Reptile McCartney Eyes?

digilander.libero.it...

digilander.libero.it...

at the bottom look at his eyes the iris is elongated...Reptilian?



posted on Oct, 16 2007 @ 04:05 PM
link   
On a scale from 1-10

1= zero evidence
5 = maybe
10 = absolute undeniable proof and truth

you have moved up from 1 to 1.5 This movement upwards is due to your repeated posting and to slightly creepy frames and your absolute conviction that we are missing something. I would be happy if you could get us up to 3 or something.

Btw: If youtube-vids havent furthered your research, why dont you prove reptilians with some other stuff? Genuine research for example. Countless instances of serpents in mythology. Reports from witnesses. David Ickes updates. Whatever. Why only youtube?



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join