Daylight UFO/ONVI

Here is a vid I came across on today just looking around. I thought it was very interesting. www.youtube.com... . It seems to have a touch of realism when he loses the object instead of just turning off the camera.



[edit on 15-10-2007 by Osyris]

reply to post by Osyris


Hi Osyris,

Im trying to find the most diplomatic way to say this. First off the video is interesting.

But thats where it ends...it's as captivating as a small black dot can be...but in fact, it's just a small black dot. There is so much to sift through when trying to gain certain truths, especially with topic as multi-dimensional and a spectrum as broad as the UFO/ET phenom, that you have to let go of certain pieces of information (while being careful to note it) that are completely inconclusive. Everyones time is finite...so as a general rule of thumb I try to follow this:

Since everyones time is precious, its probably NOT a good idea to post:

* Grainy or blurry pictures or video's.

* Small, obscure dots or points of light.

* Steaks of light

* Crappy pictures from camera phones.

I mean this is the politest of ways but I have come to the realization that if any real analysis is to be made of pics or photos these criteria really do need to be adhered to as to not waste valuable time and or resources.

Your on the right track.... you are seeking answers to some truly important questions...keep up the good work!

reply to post by 1nL1ghtened


God, that was SO polite I just had to star you.

Originally posted by 1nL1ghtened
reply to post by Osyris

 

Hi Osyris,

Im trying to find the most diplomatic way to say this. First off the video is interesting.

But thats where it ends...it's as captivating as a small black dot can be...but in fact, it's just a small black dot. There is so much to sift through when trying to gain certain truths, especially with topic as multi-dimensional and a spectrum as broad as the UFO/ET phenom, that you have to let go of certain pieces of information (while being careful to note it) that are completely inconclusive. Everyones time is finite...so as a general rule of thumb I try to follow this:

Since everyones time is precious, its probably NOT a good idea to post:

* Grainy or blurry pictures or video's.

* Small, obscure dots or points of light.

* Steaks of light

* Crappy pictures from camera phones.

I mean this is the politest of ways but I have come to the realization that if any real analysis is to be made of pics or photos these criteria really do need to be adhered to as to not waste valuable time and or resources.

Your on the right track.... you are seeking answers to some truly important questions...keep up the good work!

Well my friend, i don't know how much diplomatic you have been but of course you made the point:
there's another thing i want to say: since the camera person didn't the effort to zoom in to the object, why should we to get crazy enhancing, resizing filtering this small dot?
Anyway, my opinion is that it was a balloon filled with helium. No purposal movements, only ascending ones. It behavior is the one of an helium balloon, but of course i could be wrong.


[edit on 16/10/2007 by internos]

reply to post by 1nL1ghtened


Wow that was very..... diplomatic. That is the longest explaination of someone saying they think this video is a waste of time I've ever seen. as to what the obect is in the video and if its worth posting is up the reader. The video had not been posted here before, and the object in question was interesting in my opinion. It may not be the smoking gun. It may easily be explainded away. But that makes it none the less interesting and postable.