It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by uberarcanist
I can make that assumption because Lear routinely posts wild claims with no hard facts to back them up and a lot of evidence running against them. It's like he's doing it on purpose.
I don't think Lear's handlers are worried about the blurry videos. I think more so they're worried about 9/11, Roswell revelations, and paleocontact speculation, among other theories that actually have a factual basis.
Originally posted by uberarcanist
Yes, the fact that Lear and Bennewitz worked for the government leads me to wonder if everything we "know" about Dulce is just an elaborate, government-coordinated disinfo campaign to get the UFO crowd barking up the wrong tree!
Originally posted by mcgilligan02
www.mufoncms.com...
Originally posted by uberarcanist
reply to post by GeeGee
Anyone can claim a relationship with an unnamed, shadowy individual, this does nothing to bolster their credibility. Furthermore, I'm not sure you understand how disinfo works. Its primary purpose is not to attract belief, instead, disinfo is the most successful when it contaminates legitimate research to the point to where people stop taking the legitimate research seriously. I believe Lear is trying to turn ATS into a laughingstock, because perhaps we have gotten a little *too* close to the truth.
Originally posted by uberarcanist
But, one must ask again, where is the evidence for all this? All we have is personal narratives with few details. I think we need something CONCRETE, something that can be independently verified before we can treat these narratives as something more than a nice story.