It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nobel Prize, The U.N., NY Times, and NWO?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2007 @ 04:03 PM
link   
Is it just me, or does anybody else see through this transparent manipulation of the masses?

The Nobel committee awards Peace Prize to Al Gore and United Nations for their work on getting the word out that global warming is man-made. The U.N. is one of the cornerstones of the NWO, and Al Gore is a long-time player in the NWO arena. Keep in mind that it was Gore who decided not to ask for a total recount in the state of Florida, thus giving the Supreme Court the basis to stop the re-count in selected counties.

Next, after Gore and the U.N. are awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, which apparently no longer has anything to do with peace, the NY Times today puts on the front page that the Nobel Prize for Gore and the U.N. validates the entire global-warming-caused-by-man theory.

Can this be any more contrived?

Or do you think that the Nobel committee is really politically neutral, and the NY Times editors are science experts and this is all on the up and up?



posted on Oct, 13 2007 @ 05:31 PM
link   
reply to post by jjohns
 


The Burma monks deserved the award.

Global warming is a social/economic/ecology issue, not a peace issue.



posted on Oct, 13 2007 @ 05:39 PM
link   
IMO, al-Sadr or Sistani deserve the award for what that country went through.

Also, agreed w/you JJohns, it's a elitist organization. They use whoever pays them the most for their scientific agreement. What's scary is that the UN bought a lot of the US, terroritory throughout the whole country. Do any search about it, it's been going on since their inception.

Regardless, that's the point of their organization -- to study and print reports that describe the situations in places. They're seeming to disguise truths for special interest. I read (most of) the "UN Biodiversity Assessment" from about 1999, a lot of catastrophe theory and "down w/ religion" ideas throughout, endless researchers, about, seriously, 20 to 30 per topic, a lot of papers, over 1,000 pages. It's available used probably.

Interesting read actually; then the Blood and Gore angle, check the breaking news thread, he's a fraud. They're a mafia, empirical organization. Into genocide, forget them or renew the group fair, w/ all countries involved. It's good Russia and China have been vetoing the US about Iran, I'll say that much.



new topics
 
0

log in

join