It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unplugged
Originally posted by sollie
is he really fighting the nwo? isn't he just playing the same game?
[deleted a whole heap of nonsense.]
[edit on 15-10-2007 by sollie]
I see what you mean. The difference between this new south American bank and the other international ones is that the latter have a rich history of being tools for economic imperialism (US, Brit, etc.).
Even if this new bank and trade agreements were as oppressive to the region as the international banks and treaties, the people would have none of it and mobilize to vote the scumbag presidents out of office responsible for allowing this type of thing to happen again (like they have done in the past). Time will tell I guess...Im sure the US is going to be trying its best to stick its nose in or at least try to disrupt things.
Originally posted by benign.psychosis
Seriously, I thought the motto of this site was "Deny Ignorance," but there is a mod here saying the information is bunk?
www.bloomberg.com...
www.venezuelanalysis.com...
www.narconews.com...
news.independent.co.uk...
www.economist.com...
It looks like Mirthful me just saw the name "Sorcha Faal," made up his mind, and closed the window! This MUST have been the case, because were he to read a few paragraphs into the article, he would have seen the mentioning of the International Herald Tribune!
www.iht.com...
Deny Ignorance, Indeed!
ROFL! I guess they get all their information from David Booth...
Errr... I mean Sorcha Faal...
Hint: Even you if you get a story from a questionable source, it DOES NOT mean it has to end there.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
c'mon, he's just positioning himself to be brought into the NWO
Originally posted by benign.psychosis
The source that made a reference to the IHT is the one that you posted, not I.
I for one, consider "INFOPLEASE.COM" a questionable source for information.
Perhaps I can point you to other sources:
*SNIP
www.runet.edu...
Or.. Perhaps a link to the BBC from 2006?
*SNIP
news.bbc.co.uk...
Or from the Guardian?
*SNIP
www.guardian.co.uk...
I think that this Sorcha Fall character may be doing a little more research than you. Perhaps you should not be so quick to dismiss him?
That being said, I don't think he/she relies on INFOPLEASE.COM for his information.
You aren't one that's much for reading evidently... It is your source, in your original post that mentions IHT, not my link which is here:
eastsouthwestandnorth.blogspot.com...
Has no link to IHT, or to any other external source.
The original Sorcha Faal article that you copy and pasted... Errr... Quoted, made no reference to the IHT or any other source.
You aren't one that's much for reading evidently... It is your source, in your original post that mentions IHT, not my link
As for the infoplease.com link, if you had bothered to look at the chart, you would have seen the link to the DoE page that has the chart in it's entirety... Here it is:
www.eia.doe.gov...
Please note, that the DoE does not give Venezuela an estimate anywhere near 1.3 trillion barrels.
Infoplease.com merely provides a simplified breakdown of detailed statistics... I see their simplification in this particular case failed to facilitate your edification.
It's Sorcha Faal... And as demonstrated by your utter lack of due diligence and attention to detail, the dissemenation of accurate information, and the assessment of the same appears to be beyond the scope of this thread.
I would also point out that the one chart from runet.edu is for "unconventional oil reserves" which is the moral equivalent of calling loose change under the sofa pillows a "retirement fund."