Need some help with 2 SOHO IMAGES

Hey , thanks for all your replies.I think its in odd images unlike any of the thousand i have ever seen.The thing that makes me wonder is a few hour after i pulled those images they were removed.Also when i took them from there these images were one and two and the third was missing and then the 4th one did not show this object.It has baffled me ever since.I will still never know what the hell it is but it is unlike any image ever seen on soho.Its just keeps bringing me back to the Saturn images of similar objects.

You guys...

If this was an alien spaceship the size of a planet, don't you think this would be on the news?

I have read somewhere that it was simply a comet. I'm too lazy to google for it I'm kinda busy you can do it yourself I'm sure you'll find it. I found it in a link somewhere in a youtube video comment.

Also the most important thing...

You guys always talk about space agency coverups, THEN WHY ARE THEY NOT COVERING THIS UP?! AN ALIEN SPACESHIP THE SIZE OF A PLANET THAT SHOWS UP IN A PUBLIC RELEASED PHOTO CAN BE EASILY BE 'AIRBRUSHED' AWAY. WHY WERE THEY NOT COVERING THIS UP? Are you guys really that SNIP?

Oooops. Because these cover ups don't exist. So there ya go.

Try to use a little bit of critical thinking folks. And also try not to think to much about little grey aliens when analyzing pictures or making judgements.



[edit on 13-10-2007 by omnicron]

Originally posted by Copernicus
reply to post by mikesingh
And Occam's razor says that the simplest explanation is often the correct one, so this is obviously a CCD glitch.

Thread debunked, nothing to see here folks!

(yes, this is sarcasm)

It is also the very same approach to refuting someone that you took so much time to disapprove of, in a post a little bit earlier.

I guess it's only when the shoe fits, that it's good to walk with....

The purpose of my first post on this thread whas exactly to show how a small comet appeared to be a huge object. SOHO images have been misiterpreted many times, and it has been explained many times how does it works, in order to stop speculations about the "saturn shaped objects", "flying saucers" and "gigantic anomalies" which have been reported so many times:

What are those flying saucer-shaped objects in the LASCO images?

The "funny-looking spheroid" is a typical response of the SOHO LASCO coronagraph CCD detector to an object (planet or bright star) of small angular extent but so bright that it saturates the CCD camera so that "bleeding" occurs along pixel rows. There is a bright horizontal streak on either side of the image, because the charge leaks easier along the direction in which the CCD image is read out by the associated electronics. .....

....If you point a video camera at a very bright source (say, the Sun), the image "blooms" or brightens all over --- there are so many electrons produced in the pixels corresponding to the bright source that they spill over into adjacent rows and column, perhaps over the entire detector. Better CCD's will "bleed" only along the fast readout direction (a single row), and perhaps a few adjacent rows. ....

....A few of the LASCO images that have appeared on the "extraterrestrial" Web sites show much larger and brighter, but still saucer-like features. These images are in fact obtained with the instrument door closed, but with an incorrectly long exposure. The big "saucers" result from massive pixel bleeding along every row of the detector containing part of the image of the "opal," or small diffusing lens, in the instrument door, that is used for obtaining calibration data.

If your correspondents still prefer to believe that the pixel-bled images of planets or bright stars are something else, ask them why the extended part of the "saucers" (i.e., the pixel bleeding) always occurs in the same direction relative to the image --- even when the spacecraft is rolled relative to its normal orientation relative to the Sun.

sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...

IMHO, we should also remember that the objects which we see there aren't on a FLAT SURFACE: many of the small dots are, for instance, planets bigger than the Earth.

That being said, i noticed that there was a question about the second pic the op posted: that pic, and the next one "disappeared" frow the page which lists all the pics:
well, the answer is that many pics are SYSTEMATICALLY being removed from the list, i don't know the reason but IMHO only in order to keep the page enoughly "light" (try to publish a HTML page with a million of links and let me know what happens when you try to open it online) but of course i could be wrong. :
Besides, all the pics missing from the list are still on the server.

I made a check:
on the left, a portion of the list before the "cut": the links with a green dot are the ones which have been deleted; on the right, the same "area" after the cut.

All this does not explane the oddness of the two pics, and i think that the OP has well done publishing them: he titled this thread
"Need some help with 2 SOHO IMAGES", not "Two alien spaceships spotted by SOHO".
This means that his only purpose is to understand the meaning of two objects possibly out the ordinary which appeared on SOHO pictures, and we can help him trying to find an answer: i'm untrained to do it so i'll avoid to make speculation about the two object. I tried to contribute looking for the original sources,that was what i could do. To state that is an alien spaceship or to state that is the result of an overexposure, if the necessary trainig is missing (or at least before reading the FAQ about SOHO), won't help the OP, i can state it safetly.
Anyway, i can say that in my opinion the second pic is more interesting than the first one, because the objects does not appears bight and its shape is odd, but sadly mine is only an untrained opinion, and its value is ZERO.

Here's an interesting video which shows planets and comets:



Anyway, if i'm correct, there are at least two members here on ATS
able to "read" the soho pictures: if i'll find one of them, i'll send him an U2U asking to contribute to this discussion.


[edit on 14/10/2007 by internos]