NASA Hiding the truth?

Have you seen this video?

www.metacafe.com...

She is willing to testify what she told before congress... hmmm.
Of course : NASA hiding the truth, what else is new. What really bugs me is that if what she is saying is true then NASAs official position in UFOs sound clownish. Also why do they hide their information? If they meant any harm wouldnt they have done it already? Makes no sense to me.
Maybe they are trying to figure out their plan. Figure out why they are not trying to communicate with us but just observe us. This is the only logical explanation for keeping it Top Secret. A lot of maybes...

[edit on 10-10-2007 by ATS_123]

[edit on 10-10-2007 by ATS_123]

I think that they are keeping it secret because they are probably afraid of the reprecussions for keeping it secret for so long. They should just come out and tell the truth because i'm sure everybody has seen the footage of ufo's passing by the shuttles. All you gotta do is google nasa/ufo and tons of videos come up.

This poses a good question - especially for this board - either we have a hoax who is very convincing - but lacks knowledge of (in my mind) that the conspiracy theorists who dont believe we landed on the moon. This blows her creedence or those on this site who claim that as bunk. Or those eho could claim we didnt and such a lowley NASA op could have such clearence yet come cry foul.

What happened to deny ignorance folks ?

I see a woman here who cannot communicate (so probably not school'd if disinfo called be the cry. Just some one looking for attention - and in my book badly.

I would take it the film was shot at a convention?

Originally posted by Silk
I see a woman here who cannot communicate (so probably not school'd if disinfo called be the cry. Just some one looking for attention - and in my book badly.

That's quite naive of you. She is not the only NASA employee who states they're keeping a secret. Richard Hoagland also worked for NASA and stated the same exact thing. So you're telling me a grown woman in her 40's working for NASA is looking for attention? By coming out and saying what's shes seen, there is no way she benefits from this. She will only receive ridicule and no one will wanna hire her because they think she's a nut. If she was looking for attention, she'd find something much more believable than NASA's editing of photographs. There were tons of witness testimonies in the disclosure project, and if you want to believe every single one of them is looking for attention, then so be it.

I just happened to be cleaning out my basement last night and came across a clipping from Feb or March of 1991:

NASA Accused of Seeking to Hide Controversial Data.

Associated Press:
A Michigan congressman is accusing [NASA] of teaching employees how to avoid disclosing controversial information, including rewriting documents and destroying them.

Rep. Howard Wolpe (D-Mich) said congressional investigators looking into a program to develop the SP-100 nuclear space reactor, found a two-page set of instructions on how to deal with FOIA requests.

"This NASA document instructs government employees to: 1) rewrite and even destroy documents 'to minimize adverse impact'; 2) mix up documents and camouflage handwriting so that the document's significance would be 'less meaningful'; and 3) take steps to 'enhance the utility' of various FOIA exemptions," Wolpe wrote to NASA Administrator Richard H. Truly.

(Attn MODS: this is hand typed in so I have no Internet source to link to. Please don't ban me).

The article went on to talk about the alleged preparer of this document being named by the Washington Post as Lawrence Ross, director of NASA's Lewis Research Center in Cleveland.

The SP-100 program was related to the development of a new generation of nuclear reactors to provide electricity for space probes that can't generate enough electrical power from use of solar panels. Of course the use of nuclear power in space has been opposed for many years.

I don't know of the outcome of this, and cursory searches don't find any more background data. However is shows that they were on their way to covering their tracks back a decade or more. In addition, it shows some of the methodology allegedly contemplated back then.

Here's the wiki entry on Rep Wolpe. He served in the House from 1979-1993.

NASA administrator Richard H. Truly served as administrator from 1989-1992, and was a former Astronaut.



[edit on 10-10-2007 by Badge01]

The only thing I don't get is why would they have a guard watching another guard burn photos. Is it me or does that sound very stupid
If I wanted to burn photos that were top secret I wouldn't have a guard doing it. I'd have all the top Nasa officials that know the truth there to witness the burnings and no guards allowed.
This still doesn't mean I don't think they're covering things up. I believe they are, but to do it in a way that she's suggesting just doesn't sound right. If for all these years they've kept this secret then why would they make a mistake like that?

Edit a word spelled wrong, sorry.

[edit on 10/10/2007 by Solarskye]

Originally posted by Solarskye
The only thing I don't get is why would they have a guard watching another guard burn photos. Is it me or does that sound very stupid

If I wanted to burn photos that were top secret I wouldn't have a guard doing it. I'd have all the top Nasa officials that know the truth there to witness the burnings and no guards allowed.
This still doesn't mean I don't think they're covering things up. I believe they are, but to do it in a way that she's suggesting just doesn't sound right. If for all these years they've kept this secret then why would they make a mistake like that?

Edit a word spelled wrong, sorry.

[edit on 10/10/2007 by Solarskye]

Assuming that what she says is the truth.
She is just saying what the guard told her. I do believe that a guard in resticted areas are bound by a contract to keep their mouth closed to whatever they see or experiece and to follow orders. I am not surprised that a guard is burning photographs. If I was a Scientist working at NASA I wouldnt want to burn myself photographs of UFOs. Somebody has to do the dirty job. The guard doesnt know what he is burning the other one who is supervisig doesnt know what is getting burned. Even the one who gave the order to burn them doesnt know. So it chains up to the persons who make the statements from NASA that UFOs do not exist. It is plausible.

Well, here at Ford Austraila, we are taught to keep secrets from our competitors, much the same as any other multi-million dollar company would.

Now, does it really come as a suprise that one of the ONLY major space-exploration companies in the world is keeping secrets?

It shouldn't.

Think of it this way: we the public have access to about 2% of what the government funded companies know about our immediate solar-system.

We have been fed nothing but sugar to shadow the bitter taste of truth. This, I think, is the way it should be. If the general public were disclosed this kind of information, could you imagine the chaos that would ensue?

I can.

America has, what, 4 guns per person? That's a hot-spot right there.

"Hell, Aliens are real? Geez.... I might go and rob a store while people freak out"..... scary but true.

Listen, humans deserve the truth, but not just yet....

Give it a couple of years, and when people stop thinking of Aliens as little green men, grey beings or reptilians, then it will naturally disclose itself.

Yes, thats only one of the witnesses from the Disclosure Project National Press Club Conference in 2001. I think im going to make a new thread with the complete video just to bring more attention to it.

LOL has anybody here ever read NASA's mission statement?

Hint: They're looking for evidence of ET life.

Translation: They're on "our" side.

That's the good news.

So what's the bad news?

Most people think NASA's dreams are a big waste of money.

Thank you for your support.

reply to post by Access Denied


Hint: Stop buying the lie.

Thank you.

Access Denied, by any chance, do you believe that Bush invaded US because he was looking for weapons of mass destruction?

Hehe, sorry, I had to say that.

I wouldnt be surprised if one day NASA confirmed the existance of ET life. It wont change my way of life since the alien form of life do not change my way of living. If they wanted this wouldnt they have done it already? If I was an alien and wanted to make my self appear I would land my space ship in front of the white house and say hello to Bush. LOL.
But they do not want to do that unless they have a secret agenta which they follow in order to expose themselves. Do not tell me about the crop signs. Oh please I do not buy this. Why do they do this 99% in the UK. LOL. I must say though that they are a piece of art from whoever is making them. ;-)
So what should NASA do is to reveal finaly their information and make discussions. For instance it would be interesting to discuss whether an ET can survive in our atmosphere. Since we have found in many planets (like Mars) evidence of existing water then oxygen can be a basic factor of life.
All this staff instead of hiding the truth from the public.
Anyway my life wouldnt change a bit if I found out that ETs exists since they do not want to change my life. It is as simple as that. So NASA has no excuse for hiding information like that.