some of you guys are being those annoying nit-picking debunkers who seem to deny anything without putting much thought into it first ...
I don't have to believe that DC is a copy of cydonia, but, maybe a copy of another pattern here ...
I don't take away the fact that an ancient interplanetary culture COULD have existed, so, some thing may be the same and match. Who knows, science
cannot disprove it. We know so little about earth ... except we have had past cataclysmic events.
I won't get into it, because, since you guys are hardcore skeptics, you will only laugh anyway, then say ... see! my book says you are wrong!
look! I found a picture of a tree with leaves in that pattern, I matched it to something common!
Why not take a step back, open you mind a bit.
I don't buy this match up perfectly ... something are a bit of a stretch, but, I do see a correlation.
I think it is asinine to pick at the 5-sided pyramid ... despite not liking the source myself ... it can be called a pentagonal pyramid ... and why
don't you go look here to make yourself bite your tongue next time before playing the I'm smarter than you card:
Pyramids with regular polygon faces
If all faces are regular polygons, the pyramid base can be a regular polygon of 3-, 4- or 5-sided:
en.wikipedia.org...(geometry)
... looks like that doesn't work right, so ... copy and paste this into your browser ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_(geometry)
.... you have to add the http-colon-slash-slash ... I cannot or it automatically makes it a link which does the same as the link before,
it sees the parenthesis as not being part of the link string and it takes you to a different page.
to say that something is not representational because of scale ... then, why do auto-makers, building and city designers make scale models? Spacial
relationship to each other IS important, scale is not. My scaled models of cars are just that ... scaled ... accurate copies ... just like a lot
of scenes in the movies too.
Scale being important, wrong words, spelling, and grammar are extremely POOR excuses for arguments on either side.
Maturity is preferred. Immaturity takes away from your point and makes people ignore you.
I don't think you could match up giza to anything in my city. Maybe so, but I doubt it. The point you are exaggerating your argument to the point
ANY place can show the same thing really doesn't do your point much justice.
You were better off to going into the psychology of humans wishing to see patterns than utter dismissal.
How about a serious, civil debate/discussion on the boards once in a while. If you don't agree, fine, but put some effort into it in a logical,
passionate, respectful manner, please.