It's all about alignment, Mars face and the White House

reply to post by sekhhmet7

sekhmet7-
Don't worry about the miss spelling this is not a test
look at my last post on this thread full of mistakes but yo "he he" see when the debunkers don't know what to do next well you guessed they attack you. Any one who does not see the alignment to now six objects again exposes yourself for all to read and view. This post is for the people to view. Lets face it "no pun entended" either you passed geometry or failed, Post and will see.
By the way sekmet7- tolerance once again you've nailed it.www.i-photo.us...



[edit on 7-10-2007 by truth2u]

[edit on 7-10-2007 by truth2u]

Scale isn't the important thing. Scaling up or down does not change the layout, angles and such, just the size. If we had to move the face on Mars to make it work, then that would be different.

It would be very interesting if these mars objects do actually line up at more important places on earth than just DC.

If we were to say this lines up with McDonalds and Payless shoe stores in "normal-town" Deleware, then those aren't locations of great significance. But if you are talking about lining up important areas and monuments in places like Stonehenge or Washing DC then we might be onto something.

Let's speculate for a moment, provided there is something significant going on. Could there be something hidden at these points of alignment on earth? Perhaps something buried of great significance at these points? If there is a meaning behind it, then what is it?

Troy

ok - you have already admitted to " scaling to fit " the image overlay - i am pretty sure you have also altered orientation , ie the top of the image is not martian north .

those manipulations alone make your methodolgy scientically invalid

but it gets worse , your selection of landmarks [ washinton ] and features [ mars ] are simply random - there is no special significance to any of the martian features you select [ with the eception of the cydonia " face " mesa ] - and yoor overlay ignores almost all the washington landmarks that other alignment believers claim are significant such as the lincon memorial , capitol building , mashington monument eetc etc etc

also by doing screen caps on your prentation so that i can see what is really going on , i notice that if one part of a landmark overlaps one part of a feature you claim a hit - that is simply perposterous . using that " method " you could align almosty anything - esp. as you are allowing scaling an orientation to match .

the features [ martian ] you are using are 10s of kilometers long so given your scale manipulation - it is easy to force " hits " based on overlap

IMHO this only demonstrates that if you beat a square peg hard enough it will indeed fit in the round hole - a fact that feild engineers have known for centuries

reply to post by ignorant_ape


Thank you Ignorant Ape. I really don't understand, and it's not for a lack of trying, how scaling the image of Mars to make it bigger, smaller, narrower or whatever, then fitting the scaled, manipulated image over Earthly landmarks counts as evidence and a conspiracy!

You've tampered with the original Mars image to fit over Earthly landmarks!

I love a conspiracy as much as the next one, but you've scaled down the image of Mars to fit over landmarks. TO MAKE THEM FIT!

I'm going to install the latest version of photoshop on my computer (as I reformatted my hard drive recently hence not being able to back up my claims) - then if you really want evidence of myself BEING ABLE TO SCALE DOWN THE IMAGE OF MARS TO FIT ANY EARTHLY LANDMARKS...then I will.



edit: Then I won't actually, as I can't find the damn installation CD.

[edit on 7-10-2007 by Arawn]

reply to post by truth2u


It has been said for centuries in occult circles:

"As above, so below"

It has been common practice for "enlightened" leaders of the world to plan out their cities and other construction projects according to what they saw in the sky. There are likely to be many Earth structures/locales that match patterns found in the heavens.

Interesting discussion. I could do without all the bickering though.

wow this is amazing perhaps all of earth alighnes with different parts of it

OK...so basically what is being stated in this thread is.....

A.) The builders and or architects of Washington DC had advanced knowledge of a new geometry recently found in correlation to cydonia, in order to have built the city to "align" with it, back in Sept. of 1793?

B.) The builders and or architects of Washington DC had advanced knowledge, that cydonia even existed back in 1793 or earlier (Because the actual construction didnt start till 1793, the planning undoubtedly started much earlier)

C.) None of the above.

Ill go with C...before you can state that Washinton was built to "align" with features on Mars, I believe you must first establish that they had knowledge of the Martian landscape. I would really be interested in seeing your research on this point as I believe that it will either prove your theory or destroy it...balls in your court, match set.

Gee, 19.47 degrees...

1947!

1+9+4+7=21

2+1=3

...

Well, it's bound to mean SOMETHING to SOMEBODY. Not me though I'm afraid.

What does all this prove in the end, apart from interesting coincidence?

reply to post by ignorant_ape


ignorant ape, arwin- Fine don't believe me

i am pretty sure you have also altered orientation

actually no I did't have to do anything but open google earth find the image from nasa overlay the face on the white house and scale it down so the only five sideded pyramid known on mars lines up with the five sided pentagon and the picture falls into place with four other points. Try it yourself you'll find of course you must sacle it. As in Egypt the Pyramids are exactly inline with Orions belt. Now your argument states that it is not scietific because the pyramids are not millions of miles apart any child could see a relationship. As far as using any picture to get this effect why bother because this is the only one that works so well.

You've tampered with the original Mars image to fit over Earthly landmarks!

WRONG! Yes as said above changing scale is the one thing done. What your trying to tell people is that I changed the aspect ratio again wrong. If anyone out wants to take the time to see this please do you'll find they fit like a glove. Remember this is not new! Get the facts I'm only bringing with more clearity for people to decide
www.startinglinks.net...

[edit on 7-10-2007 by truth2u]

Originally posted by 1nL1ghtened


B.) The builders and or architects of Washington DC had advanced knowledge, that cydonia even existed back in 1793 or earlier (Because the actual construction didnt start till 1793, the planning undoubtedly started much earlier)

yep- According to many estimates, the date of the artifacts at Cydonia range from 300,000 to 3 Million years old or older. If that's the case, then how could the Freemasons, who founded the United States of America in 1776, have knowledge of Cydonia geometry at least two hundred years before the Viking Oribiter photographed Mars in 1976?
There's only one obvious and correct answer. The Freemasons have possession of knowlege passed down through history from an ancient inter-planetary civilization that existed thousands of years before "official civilized history" supposedly began 6,000 years ago in the Middle East.

Originally posted by truth2u
There's only one obvious and correct answer. The Freemasons have possession of knowlege passed down through history from an ancient inter-planetary civilization that existed thousands of years before "official civilized history" supposedly began 6,000 years ago in the Middle East.

Only one obvious answer? Or only one answer you are willing to take into consideration?

Others on this thread have pointed out the other, more rational possibilities. And I thought there was something to this thread...


*walks off disillusioned again*

Originally posted by truth2u
overlay the face on the white house and scale it down so the only five sideded pyramid known on mars lines up with the five sided pentagon and the picture falls into place with four other points.

now that you mention it - why did you select the white house = the "face " mesa as your datum point ???

and what " five sided pyramid " its not a pyramid if it has 5 faces - bonus points for knowing what it actially is

but i digress - the feature on mars is simply another mesa with ridge lines - there is no evidence of artificiality

and as ypou still have not answered , what is the special significance of the other 4 features you selected ?

. As in Egypt the Pyramids are exactly inline with Orions belt.

actually they do not , people keep claiming that they do but infact the alignment is rather less ` exact ` than people keep claiming

look it up and note what you actually have to do to force an " alignment "

[edit on 7-10-2007 by ignorant_ape]

reply to post by truth2u


Truth2u,

I believe you, and everything about the alignment... It means everything.

IF the 2012 prophecy is true, and we all know that the galactic conjucture is a fact, then these alignments what you speak about will be exactly in place.

You could even check this if you have a good star map. Since im no astrologar i am not going to risk making a fool out of my self and let the dirty work to someone else

reply to post by ignorant_ape



yes ignorant ape,

this is truth. The last pyramid on the east (the small ones if i recall well) show a little error in the placement (if we take orion as standard)

BUT it is however possible that Orion once stood on a different setting then in these days ,

We all know OUR sun moves too

[edit on 7-10-2007 by PureET]

reply to post by truth2u


From our point of view ,the orion star look aligned like pyramid do...
but dont forget those stars are in 3d space and posibly thousand of light year apart from axis x,y and z
If you look at a right anlge somewhere in space those star will form a perfect equilateral trinagle shape

Also the monument on mars are million of year old, the landscape in DC possibly only thousand.

Originally posted by Jigore
the landscape in DC possibly only thousand.

More like a few hundred years old.

I don't get what you're trying to prove here, you've got a scaled blueprint of Cydonia and DC. You do know that squares will fit in square slots and circles will fit in circle slots, right?

You've got billions of alignments on Earth. You fit Cydonia in the right slot. The chance is, there's a few more landscapes that have absolutely no connection to DC whatsoever that will fit exactly like your DC comparison (or even better). And even if it WAS designed according to Cydonia exactly (which is near impossible, seeing as we didn't even know that location on Mars existed at the time) what would that mean? Civilizations have been designing themselves upon what they've seen up in the sky (and around Earth) since homosapiens have walked the planet.

I just don't see any significance.

Originally posted by truth2u
Remember people scale is relitive alignment is everything.

www.thehiddenrecords.com...

The HUGE problem with this comparison is they are overlaying a small number of stars from the Pleiades cluster over the small number of anomalies from the Cydonia site. The fact they line up is very interesting.

In the DC image you are overlaying the small number of anomalies from Cydonia over DC, but there is a HUGE number of buildings in DC to chose from, I liken it to getting Cydonia to overlay on grains of sand at a beach, it means nothing.

Now, if those were the only buildings/landmarks/monuments in DC and you could get Cydonia to overlay then I would admit you were on to something.

I do believe the layout of DC contains occult symbolism, but I see nothing here that points to any hidden grand design.

One simple fact Mars has the only five sided structure ever found in space and there is only one on mars and then you have the so called face close to the only five sided structure ever found in space with other structures near by. Put the image of Cydonia's five siided structure over the obvious rare five sided pentagon then rotate 360 degrees then try to tell me any where in that rotation it lines up with so many signifcant points as shown above. Also when these pictures where taken of Cydonia scientists where shocked at these structures. Hmm then we have the rovers sent to the other side of the planet why? You would think they would want a closer look at the most interesting features ever found on Mars. Also I used to follow the rovers progress daily and there where a large number of pics taken that had large blacked out rectangle areas of the sky above the horizon again why? There was nothing wrong with the camera they where put there.





[edit on 9-10-2007 by truth2u]

reply to post by truth2u


I agree 100% that they blocked out things they did not want the public to see, I also believe Cydonia was anything but formed naturally. I just do not see any reason to believe it has anything at all to do with a few random landmarks in DC. The odds of such an alignment is too great to give it too much weight. Granted anything is possible, but I just dont see any meaningful relation between the two.

reply to post by Xodiac


Thanks for your input Xodiac however I disagree with

The odds of such an alignment is too great to give it too much weight.

I believe The odds of such an alignment is too great to ignore. This is tough because it implies of a lost civilization on Mars and carried down knowledge through the ages. I believe humans have existed over time on Mars then Venus now Earth. Perhaps a Global warming scenario is responsible for evacuation of Mars and the thick co2 runaway greenhouse gas effect on Venus today. I just thank God that Jupiter protects us and gobbles up most potential threats in our Solar system as in 1994.



[edit on 10-10-2007 by truth2u]