There is no source accreditation on the
nworeport site for its main claim of U.S. warning Russia.
This makes it highly suspect, though not impossible. I would tend to believe any source other than mainstream media, of course, but the originating
"source" or author must, at least, provide a second reference point. This is simple journalistic practice.
I would be concerned, however, about the alleged plutonium shipments as referenced in the
Institute of Southern Studies article, which also
links to the
Knoxville News Sentinel.
While any source can be in error or an outright misinformation tool of the establishment, having corroborating sources can help solidify one's doubt.
Even repetitious layering of sources and confirmation is not 100% proof. Ultimately, what is the credibility of your sources?
The problem with any acknowledgment of plutonium shipments to the public is - you're also telling the "enemy." That's not smart. Yet, in an
allegedly "free" society, the people should know what evil is being transported through their community. Thus, great security and safety are
required.
As to those who diss the Egyptian reference and mythology, then perhaps you should study it. Just because you don't understand it, or deem it
inconsequential does not invalidate any possible connection, whether the nworeport is a valid article, or not. If you think the secret societies
running the world don't have some highly occult practices, then you've been living on a different planet than I have.
Likewise, just because someone is a "paranoid conspiracy theorist" does not mean they are innacurate. Since I can't corroborate the initial
warning to the Soviets, then I doubt it, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. What if the author is simply a poor reporter?
For those who only post their opinion, then I say you're doing the thread, ATS and yourselves a great disservice. Why? Because if all I read is
your opinion, then it better be a brilliant assessment of the alleged "facts," or I won't bother reading you, anymore. It is your right to ignore
me, as well. We ignore each other at our own peril, perhaps, but I don't have time to waste on ill-informed and emotional drivel.
My instincts tell me that Sorcha Faal is a tool, at best, or a frustrated writer. Sometimes, tools are used, appropriately, and all great lies have
an element of truth.
I have searched and found no credible sources in the top Russian media that would indicate that they've been warned by us. Though it's possible
that many things are buried on page 12 of obscure outlets, I would think a U.S. warning about going on high alert would A) not be published, anyway,
and B) if it were true, would be in the mass media.
Since we know that the NWO cabal has orchestrated exercises to go live, then there is very real concern, especially with all the drumbeating towards
war with Iran. That's why the threads must be followed to their source, so we may discern the image upon the tapestry they weave.
In conclusion, I would appreciate a better monitoring system by ATS to ensure that paranoid opinion is not published. If those who post cannot adhere
to some semblance of credible journalism, then this site is nothing more than a time sink and a wasted effort.
namaste