It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Analysis of the New York Times FDNY Interviews. Who SAW and HEARD Planes?

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2007 @ 11:42 PM
link   
CB_Brooklyn

The reason we talk about there being literally thousands of witnesses in NEW YORK is made by something called 'inference'.

Its used in a court of law. Eyewitness testimony is used in a court of law. Yes even eyewitness testimony that is contradictory is used. They simply just weed out the uncommon ones and go with the collaborating testimony. That is considered strong testimony.

The reason thousands of people saw the planes is due to the fact that they weren't rioting the next day in NEW YORK. Its as simple as that. There would be thousands of New Yorkers going crazy about the *LIE* when they saw the MEDIA that night, if what your saying was true. People aren't that stupid.

Also recall some of the people that support this theory have had ties in large ways to the Gov.

Namely David Shayler who now thinks he's JESUS.
Morgan Reynolds who worked in the Bush admin, he also supports the *NO PLANE* theory.





[edit on 10-10-2007 by talisman]



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join