reply to post by Outrageo
I find that discussions like these tend to demonize an entire group, based on the speaker's jaded experience with that group. I have (unsuccessfully)
tried to raise the topic of hoaxers and hoaxes here; the lack of responses subsequently led me to abandon the thread -- although I haven't requested
that a moderator close it yet.
Because they can get a few minutes of attention in their otherwise shallow, empty lives.
Because they have a need to belong, to be a part of a group, to be accepted.
I disagree with the first statement because I find it to be riddled with personal opinion. No matter how wronged one feels by an individual or group,
one must not descend to such insults about another's existence. No one has the right to define anyone else's life as shallow or empty -- again, I
don't care how low an observer finds the person in question to be. This attention-seeking argument was constantly presented to me as a thread-ender;
unfortunately, it still doesn't fit in my observations.
As (very little) research has revealed, the more recent hoaxes that have plagued the UFO community (and the events that are still 'in question')
have been perpetrated by anonymous individuals -- which is why I disagree with the second statement. In the past, hoaxers were more brazen and public
with their claims. These days, they seed their hoaxes and watch as the drama unfolds. If one briefly adopts the position of the hoaxer, one would see
just how (amusingly) predictable a fanatical group can appear to be. As I've come to realize, it's not about ridiculing what you believe. It's
about making fun of
how you believe it.
Hoaxes have begun for varying reasons. With the last wave that was witnessed by this site, one can see how things easily spiral out of control. The
hoaxer leaves an anonymous video or image somewhere "inconspicuous", and waits for someone to take the bait. Soon, the net is swarming with "CG
Experts" and many other swollen egos that are too willing to eat each other, in an effort to prove their superiority.
As the all-too-visible argument between 'believers' and 'skeptics' rage on, the hoaxer remains silent. It wouldn't be far-fetched to presume that
hoaxes may begin just to generate such a response.
If any, those with genuine evidence will clearly not come forward because of their anticipated reception. They will be welcomed as the freshest batch
of hoaxers, and they will likely be subjected to all sorts of personal humiliation (as indicated by your response, Outrageo). Those who took them
seriously would ultimately be too few to count -- unless the various Government/ET-related conspiracies are to be believed, and the revealed evidence
corroborated these conspiracies.
Until then, I will stand by what I've said. The more recent wave of ET-related conspiracies have followed a standard procedure, and (from my
observation) produced the same results. Perhaps we should all reconsider the way we treat our articles of faith; when you're absolutely convinced
beyond doubt, there'll always be someone waiting to prove you wrong.
The moral is to avoid being absolutely convinced, because our civilization still knows far too little to be 'sure' about anything. You can be sure
of your gender -- but that's mostly where it ends.