Fox reporter physically shapeshifting on camera (video)

CV, BEFORE you posted this video, how did you know the reporter was shape-shifting?!? Obviously, the original video on the fox website does not show him shape-shifting... but when compressed onto youtube, he does shape-shift. Soooooooo, if the original never showed any shape-shifting, why would you put it on youtube?

reply to post by CanadianVandal



OK CanadianVandal I'm ready to believe, lay it out for me please.
I know its a bit spotty and you don't know everything just stick to the basics. Start at the part where the reptoids are running the media and government and who you think is a shape shifting reptoid.

Reading through the various posts on this thread I know that saying this will not help at all with the discussion (minds seem to be made and set already on whichever conclusion one preffers and I wont be the one to say that is a bad thing) but if my experience is found helpfull by anyone:

- I work in digital arts and a part of my daily job is film post-production for independent movie festivals and film compression for internet galleries. This video's distortion/shapeshifting is - to put it simply - my biggest nightmare. This is a clean cut, normal, abnoxiously occurent case of loss of video quality through compression. To me it seems obvious that the person who compressed this footage was more interested in the content and so they sacrificed on image quality to compress the file.

I will not put forth any opinions regarding the possibility of reptilian shapeshifters but I peacefully offer this little piece of friendly advice (just that):

- Don't base any mutation, shapeshifting, transfiguration theories on videos that you find on the internet. Every video that is brought to the WWW has already been so compressed and downsized to fit the medium that it is just a pointless piece of evidence.

Further more I propose a possible method of investigation to make your theories more solid - when you find one of these videos do try to find the original footage outside the internet and compare both. YouTube is not the place for clean, usable, raw footage.

Originally posted by linuxman2k3
For instance, a very simple encoding problem that you can try in your own computer is this: Open Notepad and write the following without the quotes "Bush hid the facts" and finally save it with whatever name you want. Close the file and open it again. You will be surprised of what you see...
...For those who know this is a simple encoding error present because the phrase has 4-3-3-5 characters which correspond to a different encoder.

Thanks, linuxman2k3!

I tried it and you know what?


OMG!!

Conspiracy!

Bill Gates and Bush!

OMG!



[/sarcasm]



Your example of encoding errors was really weird...and kinda cool, too.

Unlike this never ending, undead thread.

Would the last poster to this thread please turn out the lights?

Thanks...

you guys have been watching too many icke videos on youtube

Originally posted by hikix
CV, BEFORE you posted this video, how did you know the reporter was shape-shifting?!? Obviously, the original video on the fox website does not show him shape-shifting... but when compressed onto youtube, he does shape-shift. Soooooooo, if the original never showed any shape-shifting, why would you put it on youtube?

The original story (about the girl/cake incident) was interesting enough to be posted on YouTube. I did a quick search on YouTube and found 3 different postings of this video, but none of them were posted because of the alledged "shapeshifting -- they were all posted because of the interest in the actual story.

...and yes, all of the postings showed the same compression artifacts, as expected.

The person who posted the one labeled as "shapeshifter" probably saw these other ones first.

[edit on 10/3/2007 by Soylent Green Is People]

Originally posted by CanadianVandal
Please wake up, how much evidence do you need? They removed it because he is really shape-shifting. If they were removing videos for not following the policy they would of removed the video that was posted 4 days before.
WAKE UP!

You just talk to hear yourself talk. You completely ignored my post last go around yet you posted right after it. I posted the original video link for you. Why don't you go back and look at it. How come he wasn't shape shifting in the original video? How come he was only shape shifting after it was uploaded to youtube? Get a grip on reality, dude! You were insightful in the Bush Alien thread, but you're acting extremely ignorant here. You're ignoring blatant truth and ORIGINAL evidence, just so you can spout garbage about shapeshifting reptilians.

[edit on 10/3/2007 by pjslug]

We should all be more concerned about the content of the video rather than the obvious compression distortion of the video. A girl gets arrested and her wrist is broken by a security guard because he didn't like the way she cleaned up a piece of cake that dropped on the ground. When her mother comes to the school to demand the guard be fired, she is escorted out and fired from her school district job. What the hell are we coming to in this country?

Originally posted by CryptoHunter
reply to post by The Phantom

 

It appears to be sat drop-out, all right.

Please notice the area of open space next to his lower left (our right), just above the animated lower third. The air begins to pixilate (signal drop-out) at the same time the area of the screen in front of his face begins to do the same thing. What? Is the air shapeshifting too?

Sorry, digital artifacts (often encountered in newsroom editing bays) do not constitute proof of human shapeshifting.

Keep Searching . . . . I'm with you all the way!

Nice! Perfect explanation while still staying humble, we need more people like you on ATS.

uhmmm.... where the hell did the video go?

it's no longer available. i never got a chance to take a glimpse of this shapeshifting phenomenon.

Can somebody please give an alternative video link? I would appreciate much of it.

reply to post by VincentValentine


youtube took it down. They reposted it a bunch of times though. Just do a search and it should pop up.

reply to post by VincentValentine


The video is still there (several postings of it). I just did a search for "girl cake" and got several versions of the news story.

And all of them had the YouTube compression artifacts on them.

reply to post by capsitan


While the satellite drop-out is a good theory, I think it is more likely caused by the manner that YouTube compresses videos. If it was satellite drop-out, wouldn't the original video also contain the pixelization? (it doesn't).

Obviously the artifacts showed up only after it was uploaded to YouTube.

Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by capsitan

 

While the satellite drop-out is a good theory, I think it is more likely caused by the manner that YouTube compresses videos. If it was satellite drop-out, wouldn't the original video also contain the pixelization? (it doesn't).

Obviously the artifacts showed up only after it was uploaded to YouTube.

Good luck getting anyone to explain that, because that was also my question. But no luck getting an answer, so I'm going to assume it means they don't know the answer and are guessing.

I found the video I think everyone here is discussing. If it isnt then Ill remove it.

why is this still going? I was over this the first page. people who believe in this are just ignorant.

ok so i dono if anyone has posted this or not but i thought it was cool.
reptilian woman

Originally posted by CanadianVandal
But by then it will be to late to save yourself.
[edit on 3-10-2007 by CanadianVandal]

Well maybe they'll turn out to be friendly. And the ones who are made out to be friendly are actually the evil ones. Ooooh!

I have this feeling that I could go on ad nauseum; theorticallyy; as it wer;ever have thqt feeling that YOU personally werent' t being recognized by whatever pre= existent structure u found yourself in?
e -- hummmmmmmmmmm an that u seriously and unequivocolly no t only didnt like the pre existent pre occcupaton wis oil, but, found that wthere were some waaaaaaat non=equivlant non pre orders that fonnd that no doubt that u weeeree wrong?