It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by robert z Also, look closely at this photo from inside the area looking out. It looks like the area around the center beam that is shored up with wood is surrounded by poured concrete with a gap between the concrete and the wood. To me this looks like the put the wood in place to shore up the building, and then poured the concrete slab, boxing in an area around the wood shoring.
Gee, and people talk about CT's reaching for any theory.
But since the FBI will not release any photos or videos we wont know if your theory is right or not.
Originally posted by ccaihc
I think it's pretty obvious that they poured concrete around the wood supports.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
The images are from 9/21.
You will not find anyone credible or any hard evidence to support your ludicrous claim.
It's actually quite comical and I hope you continue to blindly make this laughable assertion because it demonstrates how desperate you are to refute the solid point I have made with this thread.
Have a fun Saturday night!
Originally posted by ccaihc
That picture proves without a doubt that the concrete was poured, thats why it's piled up on the edges.
Originally posted by drannno
I agree with Craig, I don't see Robert pointing out any logical fallacies in his initial evidence.
[...] 100% there is no possible way that plane was anywhere near the lightpoles which were broken. I'm new to his material,
[...]
and I am brand new to this forum and his material.
[edit on 19-10-2007 by drannno]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by ccaihc
That picture proves without a doubt that the concrete was poured, thats why it's piled up on the edges.
Well i have to debate you that the picture does not prove it. Also you have no other evidence or report to verify this.
I would also like to see someone tell families that the search and rescue for thier famly members was held up so they could pour concrete.
And the FBI let thier crime scene be completley destroyed.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
To suggest they poured concrete to replace the first floor within 10 days before completing the clean up effort is quite comical.
You can still see a ton of dirt and debris!
Are you really holding on to this absurd assumption without any evidence?
For you to assert something so ridiculous only demonstrates how compelling you really think this evidence is that no boeing hit the building.
You are searching for ANY explanation no matter how ridiculous out of desperation!
You really ought to drop this one dude.
Concede or continue to look as silly as robertz.
At least he was smart enough to disappear from the thread!
Originally posted by ccaihc
I'd imagine they had all the bodies out by 9 days, so they poured the concrete, and then the pictures were taken the next day when the concrete was dry.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Ultima? Look at the pictures...there was OBVIOUS construction going on prior to the 10 days.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
The latest photo does indeed make it more unlikely that there was new concrete poured. Does not 100% rule it out though.
Ultima / Craig ~ Operation Phoenix Rising was started in the middle of September and continued on. Termed this for the Rebuilding of the Pentagon. Look it up.