Five People Arrested For Reading The Constitution At A Pro War Rally

Originally posted by tyranny22


I don't see anything to confirm that the video posted in the OP is the same protest in which quotes were taken from the CodePink Blog.

The blog confirms they were one and the same event when it says

After Saturday's raucous antiwar rally near the U.S. Capitol led to the arrests of 192 demonstrators, police at the Rayburn House Office Building snip..

As for the 192 demonstrators arrested Saturday, about five were still being detained yesterday because of outstanding warrants in other cases.
codepinkdc.blogspot.com...

That to me indicates they were linked.

[edit on 9/21/2007 by shots]

reply to post by shots


You and PistolPete, every well may be correct that this is the same event, but I saw no confirming evidence to verify this.

But by shots' illogical association of the capitol building and the number 5, I might as well assume that I'm directly related to everyone with red hair and blue eyes. It must be a fact. I mean, red hair ... blue eyes — what more proof do you need? Paperwork? Factual information? pppffft. Paperwork and factual information is for people who can't jump to assumptions.

reply to post by tyranny22


Well it is obvious the events took place in Washington and it is obvious those involved were members of code pink (hint they were wearing pink) duh Now just connect the dots nothing illogical about it is just simple deduction.


[edit on 9/21/2007 by shots]

Originally posted by jimrat201
www.youtube.com...well its now been proved once and for all, they could at least announce there is no freedom of speech instead or pretending there is whilst arresting anyone for it.

They will not announce it because that would wake people up! And they don't want a fight they want us to slowly except it as a inevitability! If it is seen as such the people will be allot more willing to except it over time!



[edit on 21-9-2007 by saltfever]

The system here is very tricky and for the powers that be, very effective.

How do you bring about a one-government world?

Step 1. Introduce a believable "science of the mind" to the broad public (psychology and psychiatry)

Step 2. Give that "science of mind" a goal: In Oct 1945 at the US dept of the interior in Washinton DC, Co-founder of the world federation for mental health. G. Brock Chisholm said:

"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas."

Step 3. Broadly disseminate this practice throughout the major aspects of society. The education systems, judiciary systems, politics and religions. Make this group and all who support this cause "legally" above the law.

Step 4. Use the media as the primary weapon for this activity. The media is perfect for societal mind control, brainwashing if I may, as it is widely trusted and the source is always anonymous.

Step 5. Provoke catastrophic attacks (9/11, various bombings in Europe and now Lebanon) so as to make an excuse for a constitutional abortion such as the Patriot Act and Homeland Security. This effort to nullify human and constitutional rights must be cleverly contrived and promoted for "safety's sake".

Step 6. Manipulate worldwide politics into cat-and-mouse arguments between parties and political stances such as "conservative vs. liberal" and "Democrat vs. Republican" in order to distract thinkers from what's going on behind the scenes.

Step 7. Work to remove borders between neighboring countries for alleged "economic" puropses. Make sure you look up "Mexamericanada". It's happening.

Step 7. Now that the masses are now thouroughly converted into "sheeple" and societal mind control has been mastered, forward the NWO agenda, carte blanche.

Sadly, today's society has gotten through to about step 6. Obviously there is much more to this agenda than what I have pondered here. But nevertheless, WE are the only ones that can help bring sanity to this decline and justice to those who support it.

Personally, if I was one of those police officers in the video and I heard the codepink ladies saying that they were being arrested for reading the constitution and claiming to be held without being charged with anything and I knew that to be incorrect, the first thing I would have done, obligated or not, would have been to tell the camera in my face recording everything that they were being detained for crossing a police line, not for reading the constitution. This could have diffused the situation and would go a long way towards keeping a good reputation with the citizens.

[edit on 22-9-2007 by Exemplar]

i would like to know the whole story. its seems we have some missing parts. i am sure the woman is innocent of any crime but the police would not have acted without any reason. even the guy who was tased in florida was tased for a reason (resisting arrest). the police were going to escort him out of the forum (which is my opinion is b.s.) but he decided to get physical and start fighting off the police.

bottom line... the woman most likely was not arrested BECAUSE she was reading the constitution but more likely because she resisted an officer who was going to escort her away from the event. i am not saying the officer is right in trying to escort her away but she is responsible for her action in dealing with the officer.

america hasnt banned the constitution yet, only just a few books about bush and the war.

praetorian guard alive and well

reply to post by seridium


I love it when Jim Cramer says that our government is of, for, and by the corporation. He is so right on that. His stock picks are another topic.

This is good material. Im posting this vid on myspace!!!


I dont like the fact it was a pro war rally, but even they have rights!!!