It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Yadhel
Originally posted by TheBorg
................
Either way, I don't think a nuke should be used in any regards, as that would be far too devastating, and it would kill many more people than would be necessary to accomplish our goals.
...............
I am going to ask this one more time.
Where in the world is all this talk about the "U.S. nuking Iran" coming from?....
What is the evidence "the U.S. is going to nuke Iran"?....
All i see are exagerations being made to bash the U.S.
Originally posted by Regensturm
reply to post by Truth4hire
This Bowman is a true patriot.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Allowing Iran to get nukes would be a big mistake, as they have demonstrated time and time again that they can't function as a well behaved member of nations.
Originally posted by semperfortis
Of course Grover,
YOUR OPINION
More FACTS though for the record..
Stretched thin?
hmmmm
130,000 troops after this Christmas... 160,000 now for the sake of argument..
In 2005, the military had 1.38 million personnel on active duty,[48] along with several hundred thousand each in the Reserves and the National Guard for a total of 2.3 million troops.
WIKI
Semper
Originally posted by Deus_Brandon
This is just retarded .. U.S. Would not impose such actions as to Nuke somenoe unless all other options were null and void. And something else was going to become of theit actions if we don't do something. Can't you see that but what we are doing right now ?
reply to post by dgtempe
I urge people to go out and read some books on history, especially wars throughout history. There arnt any good guys or bad guys. Its all about Initiative and Opportunities.
And Bowman is not a traitor. He's a citizen with a free speech. Even though I dont agree with what he says I would fight to defend his freedom.
[edit on 18/9/07 by MikeboydUS]
Originally posted by Electro38
There are no good guys or bad guys? Wow! What would you say Hitler was, or Bin Laden?
What would you say of the dictators and Fascist who are oppressing people's rights, all for the love of power and money? Who execute "ethnic cleansings", and kill people for speaking freely or disagreeing with their leader's beliefs?
I guess they would be neither good or bad, I guess that's a "gray area".
So you recommend we should read some history books? I guess you would also recommend that we believe everything that is written in these books?
[edit on 18-9-2007 by Electro38]
Originally posted by Electro38
Let's say he's a great patriot. Doesn't anyone else find his statement about the US nuking Iran ridiculous?
What real general would even find that possibility to be feasible? It's not feasible, so why include such a scenario in your speech? Makes no sense at all.
Originally posted by Electro38
Won't you agree, that when or if the US needs to eliminate targets in Iran it would be done with conventional weapons, shot from boats and planes?
Originally posted by Electro38
So why, then does this supposed general make such weird statements?
Originally posted by Electro38
It's scary to see so many people support the notion that America should not defend itself, or Israel. We should all bow to these Islamic nut cases?
Originally posted by Electro38
Why is the US demonized and the hateful and dangerous rhetoric coming from these people accepted?
Originally posted by Yadhel
I am going to ask this one more time.
Where in the world is all this talk about the "U.S. nuking Iran" coming from?....
What is the evidence "the U.S. is going to nuke Iran"?....
All i see are exagerations being made to bash the U.S.
Hitler as a human being had some very evil traits. You cannot lump a whole nation as an individual human being though. Hitler was not Germany. Bin Laden is not some how a represenation of Arabs or Muslims.
The books are by no mean perfect but they are better than nothing.