It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chickeneater
reply to post by Byrd
My point is, gravity is an intelligent design. The distance is just so, and the speed is just so, the forces is just enough, it's all too much coincidences.
Originally posted by chickeneater
But no one can explain what gravity truly is beyond giving this phenomenon a name. I can name anything too, I mean, Newton didn't discover gravity, he just gave it a name, d'oh.
Newton didn't really “discover” gravity, because everyone knew that the world was full of "heavy" bodies. But he explained what heaviness (gravitas) was in a new way. This new way also allowed him to describe celestial bodies, like planets and moons, as exerting gravitational forces on each other, as indicated by their orbital motions. An orbiting planet doesn't fly away from the sun, on this view, because there is a gravitational force between the planet and the sun that continually pulls it back. Planets and the sun were, in effect, heavy.
No, atmospheric pressure is the weight of the air above us.
Originally posted by 4thDoctorWhoFan
Shouldn't atmospheric pressure have something to do with keeping us humans firmly attached to the Earth's surface?
And in a vacuum you would weight the same, if you measure the weight of something in a vacuum it weights the same as at the common atmospheric pressure.
If I am at 30,000 feet in a plane, I still weigh approximately the same as I do on the surface. I believe I would still weigh about the same even IF the plane was not pressurized.
No, things still have weight, that is why satellites fall.
But once we go beyond the edges of our atmosphere we become weightless.
No, gravity is not a theory, gravity is something that pulls objects with mass one to each other.
But as far as gravity goes, I don't think anyone really knows the truth since gravity is only a theory.
No, that is your theory, you have to prove it first.
Since atmospheric pressure keeps us attached to the Earth, this is why I guess your weight will depend on the atmosphere of a given planet.
Originally posted by ArMaPNo, atmospheric pressure is the weight of the air above us.
And in a vacuum you would weight the same, if you measure the weight of something in a vacuum it weights the same as at the common atmospheric pressure.
No, things still have weight, that is why satellites fall.
No, gravity is not a theory, gravity is something that pulls objects with mass one to each other.
No, that is your theory, you have to prove it first.
Originally posted by abelievingskeptic
wish i hadnt clicked on this one...seriously...if true skeptics come to this site and want to debunk all the true and valid info that does come from time to time. this is the type of stuff they use to do it
Originally posted by qonone
reply to post by Sekhemet
Explained very well ,great simple explanation
____________________________________________
Glass with water slowly turned over = water splashes.
Glass with water & spin it (swing) it quick = water stays put.
Gravity comes from Latin Gravitas which means weight,heaviness.
Newton didn't really “discover” gravity, because everyone knew that the world was full of "heavy" bodies. But he explained what heaviness (gravitas) was in a new way. This new way also allowed him to describe celestial bodies, like planets and moons, as exerting gravitational forces on each other, as indicated by their orbital motions. An orbiting planet doesn't fly away from the sun, on this view, because there is a gravitational force between the planet and the sun that continually pulls it back. Planets and the sun were, in effect, heavy.
www.ccmr.cornell.edu...
[edit on 9/16/2007 by qonone]
Originally posted by carewemust
I think Carl also said that the moon is slowing and is indeed
getting closer to Earth, just like the little steel ball gradually
circled around the big steel ball slower and eventually rolled
into it and sat there.
Originally posted by chickeneater
Space-time theoris are not perfect. In fact, Einstein's Theory of Relativity is not complete, it never explains all of the forces in the Universe, AKA The Theory of EVERYTHING.
I questions these so called forces not because I wonder what or how they do, it's WHY and WHERE it come from. I guess it's the same line of question with "Who created time" come to think of it.
Cetrifugal, centripetal forces, etc, it's just fascinating why these objects keep spinning at the perfect distances from e/o, never gets too close, or too far.
Why sizes of planets won't matter in it's revolutionary paths. Pluto is so far, yet Saturn is also far, yet they all follow a "set path". They should in theory, follow a different path with a different ANGLE of revolution.
BTW, Harvard and MIT is beyond explaining gravity, it's grade-school ed. Try asking that question during a lecture and people will think you are nuts.
Originally posted by Byrd
I don't understand how you got out of a physics class without the basic definition that a "force" is something that "causes something else to move or perform work or deforms it in a particular way."