It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ron Paul. The next dictator of the 21st century.

page: 1
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:16 PM
link   
In relation to another thread i posted a while ago here www.abovetopsecret.com... I have come to an interesting conclusion.

Ron Paul looks good. In fact, most americans i have talked to think that he is the best thing since freedom fries.

In comparison to bush and his government.

Hitler looked good. In fact, the people LOVED him. So much that He whipped them into a nationalist frenzy. In comparison to the bumbling administration the preceeded him, Hitler was "awesome".

Now comes Ron Paul. The current adminstration is doing their best to discredit him, they even had that muddle in the polls down in texas.

Why?

Because it makes him look even better. It cements his position even more. Bush isn't the next dictator, he was just placed to set the stage for his successor.

That successor, is looking to be Ron Paul, the next true dictator of the 20th century.

Read the other thread for the full theory, but i feel this may be very close to probability. Sorry for the hack job, i had to get this out in 5 minutes at period break, so its not up to my usual standard of writing and grammatical correctness.

[edit on 14-9-2007 by D.E.M.]



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:17 PM
link   
How does it make him look better if the only people to hear about it are the members of this board?



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:20 PM
link   
Well, with your logic, any likable president will turn USA into a dictatorship.


No, I dont think this sounds likely. Personally Im much more willing to believe that Bush will find a way to stay longer than 2008.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:24 PM
link   
i got the impression from bush's address last night that he doesn't intend to lengthen his term. i forget the words he used but it sounded like he wanted to sustain the war and have it ready to pass off to his successor.

and no, i don't think ron paul would be an evil dictator. fi you even glanced at this record and got a feeling for his values you would also see that he's not your average corrupt politician.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:27 PM
link   
I think the fact that the 08 Election is clearly focused around the 3 main Democrat candidates is a clear sign of whats coming for the US. As for Bush, you have to ask yourself, does this man want to keep going the way he is? Remember, he cries.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by 3_Libras
I think the fact that the 08 Election is clearly focused around the 3 main Democrat candidates is a clear sign of whats coming for the US. As for Bush, you have to ask yourself, does this man want to keep going the way he is? Remember, he cries.


I remember reading that and thinking "wow, nice PR trick to make the guy more likable". Of course I could be wrong.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Copernicus

Originally posted by 3_Libras
I think the fact that the 08 Election is clearly focused around the 3 main Democrat candidates is a clear sign of whats coming for the US. As for Bush, you have to ask yourself, does this man want to keep going the way he is? Remember, he cries.


I remember reading that and thinking "wow, nice PR trick to make the guy more likable". Of course I could be wrong.


Hahah maybe, whatever he meant, its just all set up for a Democratic president. It just depends on which is less corrupt. Ive got a sneaking suspicion the US will have its first female prez



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:33 PM
link   
20th Century?


I seen Ron Paul being shunned by many other politicians.

www.freerepublic.com...

dullardmush.blogspot.com...
(these are just some links that I found after a couple quicks searches, but you get the idea)


I see him as man that wants to bring back the pre 9-11 USA. He doesnt fall into the tradtional "i wont raise taxes", "ill get us out of iraq" mold that all the other canidates are using to get themselves into office. He is calling for real, drastic changes and the people he threatens with these changes are trying to keep him out. The simple fact that everyone is against him is the reason why I am for him. We need a change, it is time to listen to the person that everyone in power is trying to bury. Just my opinion.

[edit on 14/9/07 by Pfeil]



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:40 PM
link   
Do you have any idea of what Ron Paul stands for? If anything, it's totally against any dictatorship or globally dominant administration.

Maybe you have some info to contridict this?

I understand your point on the grooming process, but I think your point could have been better served by another candidate. Most politicians and political parties are threatened by Ron Paul because he stands against the things mentioned. He wants to pull Foreign Policy to a non-confrontational means. He wants to abolish the IRS. The reason many politicians don't want to support him is because he's cutting them out of a paycheck by eliminating special interests from their pocketbook.

Dictatorships are about control and dominance. Even Saddam tried to take Saudi soil before we interveined. Hell, even Bush has take Afgahn and Iraqi soil. Paul wants to stop this. He voted against the Amnesty Bill that would have left our borders open for and easy induction into the NAU. The U.S. would have benefited greatly from the NAU globally.

The facts just don't add up.

[edit on 14-9-2007 by tyranny22]



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 03:05 PM
link   
I think the fact that Ron Paul has called for the abolition of the Federal Reserve in itself shows that he is not a Trojan Horse. The existence of the Fed and fractional reserve banking is without a doubt the reason for the current state of the USA (and many other countries too); if neither existed then the USA would not be nearly $100 trillion in debt (in fact, would probably be a similar amount in credit). Ron has said a number of things which show him to be a man of principle. He may not be perfect - he is, after all, a politician, but he's the best current hope for a return to democracy within the USA. In fact, he's the best hope for the actual establishment of democracy in the USA for in truth it has never truly existed.

It is also possible that the USA is already officially bankrupt and has been since 1933:

www.afn.org...

If this is the case, then no politician will ever reverse the rot. If the USA is bankrupt then it is legally owned by the receivers - the central banks. These people who can create any amount of money to buy anything they want - including laws, governments, presidents, countries, the whole world. I'd advise any Americans who are not aware of the fact to do some serious research into central banks and the concept of fractional reserve banking.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough money to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they OUGHT to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." - Sir Josiah Stamp, former Director of the Bank of England

This is the truth about the state of the world today. The only way the world can avoid the inexorable march towards tyranny is by the worldwide abolition of fractional reserve banking, and the redistribution of the wealth stolen over the centuries by bankers.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 04:14 PM
link   
I once thought that Ron Paul was the be all and end all but as always when it comes to politics, the fact of the matter is, you look at the man on the left then you look at the man on the right but wait....who's that above them all controlling it all!! They're all as bad as each other and for their own 'agendas'.

If at all true, then it's seen that the honourable Mr. Paul is infact a White Knight, put in place by NESARA as a front for Faction 3 to accommodate in bringing about the 'Alien Agenda'.

www.thewatcherfiles.com...

As I said....Who's above them all? Who's the puppet master? If at all true?




posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 04:20 PM
link   
reply to post by JimmyProphet
 


With many "politicians" I'd agree - but Ron is that very rare breed who comes out in public and tells us to beware of the puppetmaster.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Cos he knows 'we're' watching!!!


Time will tell really!! But dont have TOO much faith in him!! It's happened all too many times before with other people!! For us in UK - Tony B(liar).....

All im saying is politicians and governments today are elected not so much as a sovereign principle; for the people and by the people, but instead as those who can work and be manipulated by those WITH THE REAL power!!

They ALL have agendas which ultimately will enslave humanity!! My thoughts anyway!!



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 05:28 PM
link   
I'm a very good judge of character and I can tell that Paul is the real deal. He is a very kind , concerned person.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 05:33 PM
link   
reply to post by JimmyProphet
 


Jimmy, I agree 100% - especially about Tony Bliar. And as you say, time will tell. My own gut feeling is that any establishment drone would not be so forward in publicising the real reasons for our enslavement. But I would not discount the possibility that you are right; to quote our good friend Baldrick Ron Paul may well be a Frozen Horse. And you're right that it is dangerous to trust ANY politician; whilst many of our well-meaning American friends (no slur intended) view our British cynicism with disgust, constant cynicism is the only way to provide effective oversight of the people we allow to rule us. I think it was Plato who said "the price good men pay for paying no attention to politics is to be ruled by worse men than themselves"; sadly this is very true.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 05:46 PM
link   
Indeed!! Wise words, wise words!! But at the min, it looks like he aint got a hope in hell of getting in, what with the U.S. news coverage not giving him the time of day!! I like him alot!! Seen what he's had to say, agreed with most of it! Was amazed he was standing up against the globalist elite!! The opposite of EVERYONE else!! Made me think it was all to perfect though!!

Hmmmmmmmmmmm interesting though!!



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 06:11 PM
link   
This post is pure DISINFORMATION. Ron Paul would be the best president since JFK if elected (which i highly doubt).

If anything Romney would be the best candidate for a dictatorship, since his views against extremist make him the worlds most evil mormon.



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaVillen
This post is pure DISINFORMATION. Ron Paul would be the best president since JFK if elected (which i highly doubt).


No, it's SPECULATION. There's a big difference...



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 08:45 PM
link   
reply to post by D.E.M.
 



I'm trying to figure this out here? Ron Paul a dictator? How do you figure that?

He gets NO attention on CNN. The little attention he gets on Fox is them trying to discredit him. If he was to be Bush's next cronney do you honestly think they would be treating him like that?

He is still on the low rung. Sad to say since this media gag on Ron Paul he won't get elected due to the corruption in Washington. Even if we rally and all vote for Ron Paul. Bush will perhaps call off elections.

I do believe with my heart Ron Paul has the best intentions for America not these other so called presidental canadates.

I don't like your claims to Ron Paul being a 21 century dictator. This is what I think of that.....


[edit on 9/14/2007 by Leyla]



posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 01:53 PM
link   
He is the real deal. He can't change everything as he believes in the Constitution and that will limit him since alot of the politicians do not want change, they make plenty the way it is. We need to tell as many people as we can and register to vote, why not give him a try, look at his voting record and his website and tell me what you disagree with. He wants to leave abortion, drugs, etc. up to the states the way a constitutional republic is ran. He will secure the borders, bring the troops home and abolish the federal reserve, that much he will do.



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join