It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by uberarcanist
reply to post by LDragonFire
But I think it's very telling how some will try to ask a loaded question but try to sound objective while asking it.
Another question. What type of governments would be around without the influence of religion?
Originally posted by WeaponsOfMassDistraction
reply to post by LDragonFire
Actually, I think the question is phrased correctly. Religion is indeed man-made and is the complete organization of spirituality by intelligent beings. Would other intelligent beings do the same?
If 'religion' was replaced with 'god', you couldn't really get anywhere with the question. It could be said life evolved without god, it could be said life evolved with god, either one works. It's "religion", our man-made creation, that makes it hazy, because we are restrained by all the history, doctrine, and dogma that comes with the religion.
Belief in god came way before religion, and god doesn't need religion. Life could have evolved with god or without, it doesn't matter. Let's just suppose god does exist, or at least there is a spiritual nature to the world... would it be inevitable that intelligent life would invent religion?
Originally posted by uberarcanist
reply to post by LDragonFire
I never said I was objective, I am just implying that atheists are no better than theists in that they are really only relying on an unprovable matter of opinion.
Originally posted by newinitiation
Only feeble minded people succumb to the influence of religion.
Thinking for oneself instead of believing eveything that is tossed to them is a sound approach to life.
In the end if everybody took responsibility for their own feelings, thoughts and actions and did the right thing, why the heck would anyone need religion.
Religion is poison