posted on Sep, 13 2007 @ 09:49 AM
As some of you may not be aware, on the 10th of September 2007, only three days ago, an 18 year old Private became the youngest British soldier to die
in Afghanistan. A great loss, and painfully pointless.
I haven't supported any of Britains foriegn policy in the Middle East and South East Asia, be that Afghanistan or Iraq, but I have always supported
the troops there. There is no reason for the mass of troops that are there ever being there, and there no reason in them staying, only to be magnets
for roadside bomb shrapnel. On a personal level, I remember being 18, and how I could barely handle the responsibilty of a relationship, let alone a
fully loaded SA80. I can't imagine how terrible it must be for these children.
It was through finding out about this story that I saw an interview on BBC News with the kids parents, and it saddened me further. The kid had always
wanted to be in the army, and fair enough, I'll say nothing against that, his choice. But his family were so painfully naive. The mother said she
"Always thought the forces that be would keep him safe, I always trusted the government." It only got worse when the boys younger sister, could have
been no older than 16, said she was going to join the army when she could "to make my brother proud" she said. And the parents said nothing about
that. Why would you want a second child of yours to be killed at such a young age for nothing? It saddened me, for all involved, because none of them
have done anything wrong. However stupid the family are, they didn't deserve to lose their son. Nor did the son deserve to die. He was just in a
place he shouldn't have been when he shouldn't have been there. And such are the orders of every soldier in Iraq and Afghanistan at the moment.
Any thoughts on this tragedy?
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/07/nsoldier107.xml
[edit on 13-9-2007 by Subcomandante]
[edit on 13-9-2007 by Subcomandante]
[edit on 13-9-2007 by Subcomandante]