The Missing Nuke and Steve Fossett

The Missing Nuke ?

www.rumormillnews.com

On Aug. 30th we had the B-52 nuke incident, no one knows for sure if there were 5 or 6 nukes yet.

If there were 6 ONE IS MISSING

On Sept. 3rd, we are being told that a famous man went missing... a highly connected famous man.

for days they have been searching for him....

(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 8-9-2007 by pai mei]

I don't know how reliable this site is, but it brings some strange news.
They say that the search for Steve Fossett is a mask for the real search for a nuclear weapon because there are all sort of military forces involved in the search.

www.rumormillnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 8-9-2007 by pai mei]

An interesting theory...

I welcome the correction, but my understanding is nuclear warheads leak enough radiation, although harmless, to be detected. Sensors at shipping docks are designed to pick up the leakage. If correct, it stands to reason that finding a missing warhead in the desert would be a fairly easy task.

I also found this:

www.rumormillnews.com...

It also talks about the nukes, and the possibility that one is missing. This article suggest that the Chinese had something to do with it, adding transport orders when they hacked the Pentagon's computers. These two articles share a common theme, and perhaps the truth is a mix of the two.

Key Word being IF...

If there were 6, IF.....

paimei it is good to keep an eye out on this situation as the end result will affect us all if it is true and one more nuk is indeed missing.
However it is a stretch of the imagination to assume that the nuk was dumped somewhere out by the Nevada deserts. It could be strapped to a plane headed anywhere in the world for that matter.
Now if it had been part of the group that was taken from Dakota to Louisiana the other day, no way could it be in Nevada. They are too far apart.
As for the terrible and tragic story of Mr. Fossett, maybe he accidentally landed in a restricted area and is evading the military thinking that they are after him rather than attempting to rescue him.

reply to post by elevatedone



Yes I have to agree with elevatedone. After following the threads, I was unable to establish a connection between a 5 or 6 nuke dispute other than an OPINION.

However, if there are some facts that point this out, please post them.

Now, I must admit, there is a lot of very interesting information in these threads. It just feels like we may have some puzzle pieces here that need to be put together.

OP if you keep digging, I'll keep reading. Thank you.

Five nukes : news.bbc.co.uk...

It follows reports in the Army Times that five missiles were unaccounted for during the three-hour flight from North Dakota to Louisiana.

Six nukes : edition.cnn.com...

Six nuclear warheads on cruise missiles were mistakenly carried on a flight from North Dakota to Louisiana last week, prompting a major investigation, military officials have confirmed.

Hrmmm im very worried about this.

When i first saw 5 were missing on the Fox website i told my Girlfriend and we talked about it for a bit.Then a hour later Fox said 6 nukes and i immediatly thought something was even MORE fishy about this.

The first thing i thought is.These poeple are not paid to make monsterous mistakes like this.Just like 911,the iraq war,take your pick really.Pretty sure it would be impossible for them to get the aircraft and get the nukes and load them all and take off without tons and tons of paperwork being done.So how could this happen in the first place?

So then i started thinking maybe this WHOLE thing is on purpose.Lets say a nuke gos off in a U.S city and well the explosion and destruction is just to big to be a dirty bomb or suitcase bomb.

Well now we can be reminded of the conflicting news reports of the missing nukes.And they can say they went from 5 to 6 back to 5 because there was suppose 6 on the plane but there was only 5.So naturally you get conflicting reports depending where you get your information.

But the fact is on the paperwork it says 6 and only 5 were on the plane,so one is missing.We could not warn the public about this because it would cause mass panic,so we quitly carried out our search under the camo of the missing pilot.

BUM BUM BUM*insert dramitic music*.

Seriously thought that article gave me the missing link.And i think this is all to plausible.How the hell do you conflict 5 or 6 nukes.I mean thats a big deal man.Just to move a nuke from base to base you have to go through alot of signatures and procedures.SO how the hell could the reports be conflicting.I dont get it.Plus its to good of a damm excuse for the upcoming Al-CIADA attack.

[edit on 9-9-2007 by Project_Silo]

I am worried too, Project_Silo... too much is going on... things are building.

It's all very "24". Let's hope there is a real Jack Bauer out there, right?

Really interesting theory. I really hope they have all the nukes and nothing happens. If so though there is already a smoking gun...before anything has happened.

I just found another blog. It says that all 5 nukes were moved with presidential authorization.
It makes more sense, I think nuclear missiles don't just around a military base and some people arm a plane with them by mistake

www.halturnershow.com...

Military investigators have confirmed to The Hal Turner Show that
President Bush's personal Presidential authorization code authorized
the removal of five 150 kiloton nuclear warheads from their secure
nuclear storage safes.

Those Investigators also confirmed that the cruise missiles in which
those warheads were placed, were mounted on the wings of the B-52
and not placed in the belly of the plane with other missiles headed
for decommissioning.

When those nuclear cruise missiles arrived at Barksdale AFB,
Investigators say plans were made to move those warheads off the
base, allowing them to be used for what was to be a massive,
nuclear "terrorist" strike against five U.S. cities. They speculate
the attacks would have been blamed on AL-Qaida and used as an excuse
to impose Martial Law in the U.S.

Government officials are scrambling to silence this investigation
becuase it proves definitively that President George W. Bush was
personally complicit in planning terrorist attacks against his own
country for the purpose of declaring Martial law, merging the United
States with other countries after we've been "crippled" by massive
nuclear attacks, implementing "one world government" to "prevent
anything like this from ever happening again" and, of course,
remaining in power forever as absolute Dictator.

Elements inside the U.S. Military are aggressively seeking to arrest
President Bush while top Brass in the military is doing everything
possible to quash the crisis.

[edit on 9-9-2007 by pai mei]

Let's hope there are some true patriots in our military willing to protect the American people from a runaway government. I hope this is just another conspiracy theory but then again the President wrote in executive orders giving him dictatorial powers if something should go down.

I’ve been following this with great interest. I’m not sure just exactly what all's behind it, but something is going on, that’s certain. I find that the bit about China hacking in to NORAD computers to make this happen sounds a lot like someone is setting up China for blame and possible retaliation. As for the military arresting Bush, we can only hope and pray.

I recall hearing on the CBC or the BBC that Sen. Chuck Shumer of New York said sometime in the last year that a military coup might be the only thing to save the United States. Since then I have not found any record of that statement and suspect I have remembered the statement but the wrong Senator ... that, or the information has been wiped from the net.

It seems that the USA is at an incredibly dangerous crossroads that bodes ill for Canada and Australia too. I pray that if there is a coup that it is a temporary action to arrest the US President and Vice-President and install Nancy Pelosi as a sort of interim President of a caretaker government.

Even if the latter took place, I see the USA being set up by its own government for either the holocausts of nuclear attack or the horror of Civil War.

So let me get this straight..we're going to nuke ourselves with a supposed missing 6th nuke cruise missile..

I might be oversimplifying things,but if that were to be the dastardly plan,wouldn't it be a whole lot easier to just take a nuke out of storage secretly and..wait for iiiiit...NOT TELL ANYBODY? And then nuke ourselves with the one that nobody knows is gone? Obviously I'm missing something here. Next thing you know,there's going to be real monsters under my bed.

I found another story here, this time from a more respectable source. This newspaper says the nukes were supposed to be used against Iran :
www.agoracosmopolitan.com...

Consequently, there is considerable circumstantial evidence to argue that the nuclear armed B-52 was part of an apparent covert operation, outside the regular chain of constitutional military command. The alleged authority responsible for this was Vice President Cheney. He very likely used the Secret Service to take charge of a contrived National Special Security Event involving a nuclear armed B-52 that would be flown from Minot AFB. The B-52 was directed to Barksdale Air Force base where it would have conducted a covert mission to the Middle East involving the detonation of one or more nuclear weapons most likely in or in the vicinity of Iran. This could either have occurred during a conventional military strike against Iran, or a False Flag operation in the Persian Gulf region.

Last time nuclear weapons were transported by air was in 1968. And these nukes were mounted on the wings of the plane, not in some boxes. Not an easy mistake to make.
news.bbc.co.uk...

Army Times said the missiles were to be decommissioned but were mistakenly mounted on the bomber's wings.

Many US generals threatened to quit if US attacks Iran :
www.timesonline.co.uk...

There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would resign if Bush ordered an attack on Iran,” a source with close ties to British intelligence said. “There is simply no stomach for it in the Pentagon, and a lot of people question whether such an attack would be effective or even possible.

Maybe the Bush administration tried to nuke Iran by themselves. Using the same people they used for 9/11

I would like to change the title of the story, I hope they find Steve Fossett. I do not have a solid opinion about what happened, just gathering some stories

[edit on 10-9-2007 by pai mei]

reply to post by pai mei


Hrmm nice find.This is going to bother me for a while.Lets see if they find the missing pilot.And if he is dead or alive.hrmmmmm

I personally believe the nukes have something to do with intimidating Iran.I mean look at all the other recent propaganda against Iran,It fits right in.

I also heard that Barksdale Air Force Base,in Louisiana was used during the first Iraq war and the second for around 130 bombing runs to the Mid-East.Does anyone know if they do the actuall dissambly or destruction of these nukes at this base?If not we could have a bad bad situation on our hands.I would at this point with evidence that they in fact do not dissasemble nukes at this base.

It may be much worse than a nuke on our own city,as i believe dropping nukes on iran will open pandoras box.Id rather have one nuke then,Russia and China among others being very very unhappy with such a dumb move.

[edit on 11-9-2007 by Project_Silo]

Have either of the NEST teams been activated to the best of anyones knowledge?