Counterterrorism Officials Analyzing Islamic Web Post Warning of 'Special Gift'

Is it possible that the "gift," that has been promised to us and the new Bin Laden tape are one in the same? We are jumping to the conclusion that the "gift," was a code word for attack but given that these Islamists nutbags have been waiting for years to hear form their gutless leader, the video itself may be the gift.

reply to post by Night Watchman


I agree, the gift is the video from Bin Laden. Maybe another offer of truce, that will immediately be turned down.

Originally posted by UM_Gazz
No matter what or who is actually behind it, IF either a radiological device or a 'terrorist nuke' goes off in any U.S. city on the anniversary of 9/11 be assured that Iran will pay the ULTIMATE price for it.

For the sake of many millions of souls, we should hope and perhaps even pray that this is just another empty radical Islamist threat.

If such an attack is to be claimed by A/Q then it would be very difficult to sell the story of Iran being linked to it.
AQ even executed terrorist attacks within Iran as their Sunni enemy..
Maybe the gift is that Bin Laden [in some futuristic hologram] publicly tells the New York people the whole conspiracy/inside job about 9/11, and riots arise all over America

[edit on 6-9-2007 by Foppezao]

Just read on Major Ed Dames's remote viewing website that they have located the actual position of where Bin Laden is in North Western Pakistan and in which province and that the US is closely watching his movements, but due to political issues cannot go in to get him.

I dont know how verifiable Ed Dames is, but if true then the gift may be the other way around and we might give ourselves bin laden.

anyone else care to comment on this?

heres the link-
www.learnrv.com...

On a recent national Coast to Coast AM radio show with George Noorey, Major Ed Dames and his team have claimed to locate the stronghold for Osama Bin Laden in the Lakki Marwat District of Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province. This location is a veritable copy of the terrorist group's former mountain fortress at Tora Bora.

Due to current political relations and agendas regarding the current war in the Middle East, the United States government still has little interest in actually retrieving Bin Laden even though his movements are being closely tracked.

In recent news, it was also suggested that the U.S. government utilized Remote Viewing to locate and capture Saddam Hussein.

reply to post by Melbourne_Militia


you may be on to something....before if we were attacked by the border....we could not follow the attackers into pakistan.....and recently...(past couple months)...we have been granted permission to chase them in a little ways.....

Originally posted by 3_Libras
Actually I meant the US will find a way to link it to Iran. We all know the propaganda machine is looking for something good to use on Iran, its gonna take some pretty fireworks to convince a crowd thats not happy

Puh leeze, like Iran is some Goody two shoes that isn't doing anything wrong. It's like looking at OJ and saying "sure it looks bad" but he didn't actually do anything. Iran has the gloves outside of their house so to speak.

Anyhow it probably is an AQ surprise more than any of Iran's lackeys. Iran isn't that hip to the internet for Jihadi message boards and recruiting.

www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/040907_cheney_orders.htm

The publication reported that, "The response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States," meaning that any such attack will immediately be blamed on Iran and any evidence to the contrary will be buried.

This may answer some questions as to how Iran will be blamed for any so called attacks against American interests. The scary part of the story is the plan (as of 01 August 2005) is to use nuclear weapons in addition to the massive air strike.

Help me out here. Am I correct to say that the newest of the bunker buster bombs do contain a small nuclear warhead? If so what are the odds they will be the only nuclear weapons use?

Osama bin Laden will release a new video in the coming days ahead of the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks in what would be the first new images of the terror mastermind in nearly three years, al-Qaida's media arm announced Thursday

Source:Yahoo News

So he's not really dead(allegedly) I am very curious to hear exactly what is released on this tape, and it may give an indication what this "gift" is, if this is not the gift itself

Also,I forget where i saw it,I think I saw it on globalresearch.com.Anyway i saw that Cheney had written into one of the bills that any other terrorist strike on the U.S. would be sufficent evidence to go to war with Iram.

I hope one of you can use your detective skills to figure out if that is true or not.Besides i think we should have went to war the day we caught Iranaian revolutionary guard with bomb supplies and documents.And this happend earlier on in the war,sigh

Originally posted by 3_Libras

Originally posted by deltaboy

Originally posted by 3_Libras
Geez, let me guess...the special surprise will be linked to Iran. Cause for war in the making?

Guess Iran needs to do better using proxy forces, otherwise it just comes back to bite them in the arse if caught.

Actually I meant the US will find a way to link it to Iran. We all know the propaganda machine is looking for something good to use on Iran, its gonna take some pretty fireworks to convince a crowd thats not happy

[edit on 6-9-2007 by 3_Libras]

it seems to me that the iranians are the only ones stirring paranoia of the U.S attacking them thats your propaganda machine,if you acutally do some research instead of listening to the liberal propaganda you will see that alot of countries are very nervous at the thought of iran having nukes.

i simply suggest that they want to frighten the huge number of awaited protestors... fear is always very effective...

Originally posted by EBE154
i simply suggest that they want to frighten the huge number of awaited protestors... fear is always very effective...

who is they? the iranians?

reply to post by dan118



Iran has nukes, it would be a slam dunk....

I don't believe Osama would lie. In that case a 'gift' to the American people could be evidence of an inside job. Post it on the internet to make sure the people hear it. Or could be more bought terrorism from the CIA. I wonder whose side he's on.

Originally posted by LordSlashstab
I don't believe Osama would lie. In that case a 'gift' to the American people could be evidence of an inside job. Post it on the internet to make sure the people hear it. Or could be more bought terrorism from the CIA. I wonder whose side he's on.

Of course osama would lie,posting a lie on a site to install fear is what terrorism is about because it causes terror they want us to worry and look over our backs and wonder when the other shoe will drop thats how they succeed without ever firing a shot. and it breaks my heart that the liberal part of washington wants to appease them and apologize to them so they will stop when all it does is make us look weak and they know they can get away with it again and again..

But wouldn't the US need cold, hard evidence to prove that iran was the culprit before shooting off at them?

No.

Does the US have cold hard evidence of WMD's? nope. The Government will do and say whatever they want in order to fulfill their own agenda. Who cares about The American people and the rest of the world, I want my pockets fatter, and in the end...The world loses and the elites win again.

They will find a way to get the majority of the American people to back up the IRAN war, and if they don't they will do it any way and say they had support. As of right now, there is absolutely no way to stop them, unless we stand up and speak...but the people of america are afraid to.

Originally posted by zeroeffect

Originally posted by LordSlashstab
I don't believe Osama would lie. In that case a 'gift' to the American people could be evidence of an inside job. Post it on the internet to make sure the people hear it. Or could be more bought terrorism from the CIA. I wonder whose side he's on.

Of course osama would lie,posting a lie on a site to install fear is what terrorism is about because it causes terror they want us to worry and look over our backs and wonder when the other shoe will drop thats how they succeed without ever firing a shot. and it breaks my heart that the liberal part of washington wants to appease them and apologize to them so they will stop when all it does is make us look weak and they know they can get away with it again and again..

If appeasement were to get out of the middle east and stop supporting Israel, then I'm all for appeasement.


[edit on 7-9-2007 by LordSlashstab]

[edit on 7-9-2007 by LordSlashstab]

reply to post by zeroeffect


of course not... i meant the government / elitist groups who are responsible for that!

Originally posted by Night Watchman

Right now the only media outlet reporting this seems to be Fox News. That makes me a bit suspicious. I'm sure there will be information forthcoming in the next few hours...if there is any substance to this at all.

That's because the media are tightly controlled by the CIA. Proof is on Page 6 of this document: www.disclosureproject.org... There's probably a tad bit of confusion among the ranks regarding how to handle the whole boogeyman and fearmongery thing. They are divided over how to handle the false flag process. There are probably many true patriots in there who will risk themselves to stop their cohorts committing insanity. According to Ben Fulford, the Rockefeller and Rothschild bloodlines are following different goals, and then you have the Chinese coming in and threatening to spoil their party. Things are divided in the underground. I suspect the Islamic extremists themselves will be beginning to get a little toey as they await orders from their masters at the top of the pyramid. They'll have to be content with ticking along with the drug-running til they eventually get the green light (blinking with a green "P" for Patsy!!).

I don't claim to have any verifiable proof of this, it's just my assessment of what's going on right now. So many conflicting reports. I believe there's a lot of dissention going on behind the scenes. Maybe a lot of the quagmire stems from the sticky issue of Iran. There's a push to get in there (as per the PNAC) but are the possible consequences deemed too risky? Even for the powers that be? Is there a sector within who have analysed the future via Looking Glass technology (for more information, go to the Project Camelot website and watch the Dan Burisch interview - approximately 33 mins into Part 1) and decided that the risks are too great? It's all food for thought. Just throwing a few "out there" ideas into the mix to offer up other possibilities.

[edit on 7-9-2007 by RiotComing]