Originally posted by bsbray11
They paid for the survey. Zogby International is the organization that actually conducted it. What's your point? Something against
Zogby?
Wrong. In Zogby's words, they "conceived and commissioned" the survey and Zogby executed it.
I have nothing against Zogby whatsoever. And if people were referencing statistical techniques in these arguments, I'm sure I would have found your
cut-and-pasted paragraph on their information gathering to be very pertinent to this conversation. The problem is, people are presenting the
actual responses as as unbiased snapshot of public opinion. I'm just not sure that's true.
And you know how I feel about truth.
I love it more than anything in the world.
If 911truth.org and other 9/11 conspiracy entities (including Jimmy Walter, the man who brought you the scientific masterpiece
In Plane Sight)
were involved in the creation and funding of the survey, then the validity of those polls will naturally be brought into question.
If our roles were reversed you'd make the same argument.
We both know this.
And I was making references to all of your posting garbage earlier because you kept changing the subject every time I asked you to explain
your reasoning, not because all of your biased nonsense was changing my opinion of anything.
False.
I am so unbiased I make myself sick.
I'm like the south pole, neutrally floating on an iceberg of truth, with little penguins of integrity sliding playfully down my truthy slopes.
Well, do you have any evidence that Zogby is now biased and distorting their results on 9/11 polls?
I have a poll synopsis with Zogby International claiming authorship, posted on their website, and spewing the party-line rhetoric of 9/11truth.org.
It doesn't paint their results as unbiased to me.
So what's the problem, Essedarius? Why does what all of these other people think bother you?
Oh don't worry, it doesn't.
I just feel so empty when you and I don't get a chance to talk about something.