Possible Brown ET Picture, Speilberg Got it RIght

An image I took in my garden after my dogs were going crazy. I played with the contrast where I can see something to highlight it. The head/shoulders and chest I feel are correct, I'm not sure about the rest of the torso or the legs. To try to see it, i have a high res laptop LCD and I'm flipping the screen up and down to try and contrast it out. This is just my opinion of what I can see!! I think its only partially visible, almost invisible , completely strange. Perhaps Its wishful thinking on my part. However its head, (at least) is from a creature I've seen before. Maybe in my subconscious this image resonates with me.


The ET is here:


The original image no adjustment is here:


The original with ET highlighted is:


[edit on 24-8-2007 by alhambrial]

I don't see the ET without the highlight, even with it I see a bush. It's dark, so if it was an ET, there'd be no way to tell the color. I'll bet the plants are green, but they look brown as well in that lighting.

[edit on 24-8-2007 by EBE 17]

reply to post by alhambrial


I don't see it. What made you think there is something in the picture?
RR

wow the trolls are really invading this site hardcore. I reckon when school season starts it'll drop off sharply. I hope.

I haven't seen many trolls. Alot of opinionated people, but no trolls. But then again, I don't visit every forum either .

On topic, I still don't see much of an alien. The highlighted area doesn't seem too symmetrical and doesn't fit the shape of an alien according to what I've read. Where'd you find this?

Firstlty, I dont think the image I uploaded to FLICKR has the full resolution, and whether people can see it the same as I do for the original. (checking out FTP sites).

2) I recommend people try and download it and really look at it in your favorite image editor. i.e. zoom-in. play with brightness! Please do this, its worth doing in!

3) To me there are other similar shaped entities in this image, I wondered if others can spot them, again you might need the original image.

4) I have other images of things in this area at another time of day, (daylight).

As I say I might be wrong, or I might have a very different perception on things to most people.

Originally posted by wildone106
wow the trolls are really invading this site hardcore. I reckon when school season starts it'll drop off sharply. I hope.

i dont see a troll.... or an alien!

this is a troll..a badly drawn shape over a dark picture of tree's..c'mon..

Originally posted by EBE 17
I haven't seen many trolls. Alot of opinionated people, but no trolls. But then again, I don't visit every forum either

.

On topic, I still don't see much of an alien. The highlighted area doesn't seem too symmetrical and doesn't fit the shape of an alien according to what I've read. Where'd you find this?

Alright, I did play with the brightness. Now I see where the picture took place, your yard or some yard. BUT I still don't see an ET. Just a bush.

img172.imageshack.us...

Originally posted by alhambrial
An image I took in my garden after my dogs were going crazy. I played with the contrast where I can see something to highlight it. The head/shoulders and chest I feel are correct, I'm not sure about the rest of the torso or the legs. To try to see it,...

I am, unfortunately there's nothing there. (?)

Your image, simply enhanced and focused.




???

Please re-read what I say. I might be right, I'm most likely wrong. Please make your own mind up dear reader!!

Why is it that skeptics only post (immediately) on here after a` post? Perhaps they are paid to do so, I've never seen a believer answer someones post first up, ever!

Same bush in daylight, and again only a few of them I can see! The original in the center is un-molestered. loads more.



[edit on 24-8-2007 by alhambrial]

Mate, i believe in aliens as much as the next person on these forums, but all you have is trees. It's like trying to see shapes in clouds, you can always see something. A tree is a fairly dense texture, of course you'll be able to make shapes out of it.

So why do the Aliens in this picture look entirely different than the "ET" one you originall posted. Aside from how awefully drawn it looks.
And they wonder why people laugh at us? IM sure there will many who believe you 100% but please...


[
quote]Originally posted by alhambrial
Please re-read what I say. I might be right, I'm most likely wrong. Please make your own mind up dear reader!!

Why is it that skeptics only post (immediately) on here after a` post? Perhaps they are paid to do so, I've never seen a believer answer someones post first up, ever!

Same bush in daylight, and again only a few of them I can see! The original in the center is un-molestered. loads more.



[edit on 24-8-2007 by alhambrial]

Adjusting brightness/contrast shows more of the yard, that's all for my eyes.

What is the 'Created with The GIMP'
Is that the editor used to alter the picture?

reply to post by roadgravel


THE GIMP is a freeware imitation of photoshop

Is this thread serious?

There is not even the slightest evidence of what you are claiming.

There is absolutely nothing in these photos out of the oridinary.

Nothing in bush

Nothing in bush 2

Trace shows nothing


Thanks for coming to the site. Sorry we don't see anything.

Cheers,

Leibolmai

Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
Your image, simply enhanced and focused.

I love it. Clean it up really. Focus it. Put some light on it. And there's NOTHING THERE! What a great enhancement. Thanks. Now, OP don't get all hot and riled at debunkers. In this case, there's nothing in the picture to debunk.

Here's an idea.

Post the original picture somewhere.

Post the version of Gimp used and then post the settings and changes in the order you performed them. A member or two with Gimp can follow them and should end up with the same result. Seems reasonable.

Its laughable,
how much effort is put into shooting this down. So many (NSA?) up-for-a- buck-monkeys on here?

Listen up, I MIGHT BE WRONG, I'm not saying this is the mustard. At the least cool images, you are wrong-footed.

However, Heres two more in the bush!