It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ADVISOR
Yet many other members, continue to carry on with their stories to the end.
Examples are such as, UFOs and alien encounters, yet no proof, no one camera shot or unblurred picture. Yet none of them are punished as hoaxers, and they continue on.
Originally posted by teresius
oh, i get it. if we don't toe the line and accept the official story (which is utterly laughable when you use logic and analytical thinking, as you propose), then you're a kool-aid drinker.
the official story does NOT HOLD WATER.
there is absolutely NO WAY for an unskilled, amateur pilot to strike the pentagon the way they did.
here's a small piece to think about:
a passenger jet creates a horrific, turbulent wake when it is landing. if you were on the tarmac and the plane passed 15 or so feet over your head, you would be tossed about like a rag doll. and this would occur AFTER the plane had decelerated for landing. now imagine that same plane passing overhead doing 400-500 mph (as in the official story). of course the turbulence and wake would be greatly increased.
and consider the testimony offered by rumsfeld (i believe it was rumsfeld) that one of his staff was no more than 10 feet away from this huge jet engine on the plane as it plunged into the building. does it seem logical or likely that he would have survived this event, as opposed to being another casualty of that horrible day, sucked into the maelstrom in this jets wake.
odd, don't you think?
Originally posted by OutoftheSky
3-4 years ago....
9/11 ABL - Smoking Gun theory is bull# because i made it up as a tactic to irritate and also prove a point how ridiculous stupid fringe conspiracies are designed to mislead and irritate the public.
Here is the post from 2004
www.letsrollforums.com...
Originally posted by OutoftheSky
3-4 years ago....
I posted this nonesense as a theory as to why the WTC collapsed and to also sidetrack the ridiculous theory of the Pod.
So i guess you can say I was the originator of the Particle beam weapon theory and also the video was originally used by Letstroll911 to prove that it was a targeting laser held by some guy on the woolworths tower to guide the plane into the wtc
[edit on 23-8-2007 by OutoftheSky]
[edit on 23-8-2007 by OutoftheSky]
Originally posted by hikix
Well you're probably going to be banned (if you care) for posting a known hoax. you could've worded it differently.
Originally posted by Speakeasy1981
Originally posted by teresius
oh, i get it. if we don't toe the line and accept the official story (which is utterly laughable when you use logic and analytical thinking, as you propose), then you're a kool-aid drinker.
the official story does NOT HOLD WATER.
there is absolutely NO WAY for an unskilled, amateur pilot to strike the pentagon the way they did.
here's a small piece to think about:
a passenger jet creates a horrific, turbulent wake when it is landing. if you were on the tarmac and the plane passed 15 or so feet over your head, you would be tossed about like a rag doll. and this would occur AFTER the plane had decelerated for landing. now imagine that same plane passing overhead doing 400-500 mph (as in the official story). of course the turbulence and wake would be greatly increased.
Do a search for Maho Beach.
www.rtl.nl...
and consider the testimony offered by rumsfeld (i believe it was rumsfeld) that one of his staff was no more than 10 feet away from this huge jet engine on the plane as it plunged into the building. does it seem logical or likely that he would have survived this event, as opposed to being another casualty of that horrible day, sucked into the maelstrom in this jets wake.
odd, don't you think?
Please, show me this testimony.
As for the opening post, I understand what your intention was.
You would think people would look at all the available evidence, then form a conclusion from that evidence. A majority of "9/11 Truthers" or whatever you want to call them, do it the other way around. They have the conclusion that the government was behind these attacks, then they go about bending and cherry picking evidence to support their predetermined conclusion. This is why there are so many conflicting and ridiculous theories floating around.
No other conclusion is acceptable other than the government being behind it.