It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by nyarlathotep
I don't have a good answer for that question N. I suppose that the revelation that we are not the only ones in this solar system would make us think twice about our destiny.
People might question if it was really necessary to continually foment war. And that would create a major problem because our society is based on a war time economy. Without war there would be nothing to stimulate economy; not medical research, not technology for technologies sake, nothing.
We have to have war to get people to pitch in and help go after those rotten commies! Our entire infrastructure is military based. And if we don't have an enemy we create one. (Why those dirty rotten arabs! They kill people! )
We could probably give $25,000 cash to every man women and child on the face of the earth for all the money we have pumped into Afghanistan and Iraq, and everybody would be happy. But peace is not our profession. War is.
Now I want to make this clear: I don't have a better idea other than the same old altruistic ones. And that is not going to put money in the pockets of those on top.
Originally posted by Melbourne_Militia
I beleive they do not want the other nations to know what they have up there, hence the quote by Bush last year I think it was that the US reserves the right to deny access to space against anyone they perceive to be a threat.
Originally posted by bohicaomnicrom
First the shuttle would need to use its OMS to slow down enough for a SSS to catch-up. Even if it were just a few thousand clicks behind, the OMS would need to shed a decent percent of the Shuttles 17,000kph velocity in order for the SSS to catch-up.
Then the OMS would need to be employed again to kill the relativevelocity between the two objects to allow docking - so the maneuvering system would then have to provide significant acceleration to make this possible.
All this from a system that has enough fuel to acheive a delta-v of 300m/s?
Originally posted by defcon5
You forget that when it slows down it moves into a lower orbit, which means it has to fire them even one more time to get back up to the 17000kph speed required for the stations orbit altitude.
Originally posted by bohicaomnicrom
And, of course, it's 17,000mph, not kph. I really am undergoing some kind of logic failure today. Also, am I right in recalling that the drag compensation in LEO is around 20-35m/s per year? Or am I really off the ball here?
Originally posted by bohicaomnicrom
No excuses - just a seven month old baby decided two weeks ago that being nocturnal was far more fun
I really am undergoing some kind of logic failure today. Also, am I right in recalling that the drag compensation in LEO is around 20-35m/s per year? Or am I really off the ball here?
Originally posted by bobbyt
I realize there are limitations on orbital physics and so forth, but I would still assume that if the shuttle itself can meet up with the IIS, it should be possible to make a SSS that can perform similar manuvers.
Originally posted by jra
Astronauts are people too, and they need to eat. From what I've read, an Astronaut consumes about 30kg a day. The three astronauts on the ISS will consume about 2.8 metric tons of food and water in a month. That fruit won't last long at all.
I can't speak for all NASA facilities, as I'm sure others are more impressive,
Now I know these statements can't speak towards if the astronauts were ordered elsewhere, or if another government agency gave the order, but if these were true, there would be many unhappy employees.
Originally posted by johnlear
Most of the secret stuff goes out of Reagan and Woomera but not all. There is some really, really secret stuff that is launched elsewhere.
Hi John
Were is Reagan and Woomera located ??
Were is Reagan and Woomera located ??
Originally posted by zorgon
You were in San Jose yes? Face looked familiar
Originally posted by bohicaomnicrom
...other nations needs to be informed of launches. If they're not it sets all kinds of red-lights flashing on nuclear warning monitors...
Originally posted by Melbourne_Militia
I do believe that it will contribute to this topic.
By Newt Gingrich 1983
" . . . He who Controls Space may well control the future of Mankind. We have a chance, through High Frontier, using existing technology to develop a space program that is absolutely necessary to our survival and that will give us a chance to move past the Russians to assure our own nation and freedom a future on this planet"
General Kevin P. Chilton
Commander, Air Force Space Command
"The establishment of Space Command is a crucial milestone in the evolution of military space operations. Space is a place--like land, sea, and air--a theater of operations. And it was just a matter of time until space was treated as such."
~ General James V. Hartinger, 1 September 1982
Which beggars the question, why dont they use these platforms now???
Initial identification of the cadre began in mid-2001 with the standup of the Naval Space Cadre Working Group and culminated in a naval message (NAVADMIN 201/03 DTG211435Z JUL 03) announcing the first 700 officer members of the cadre. These officers were identified by the subspecialty codes of 6206, Space Systems Operations, and 5500, Space Systems Engineering or by the additional qualification designator of VS1, VS2, VS3 or VS4. Identification of enlisted and civilian cadre members is more challenging, as these groups do not have specific space identifiers like the officers do.
Approximately 265 billets are currently identified as space billets. These jobs are in Navy, joint and National Security Space organizations. Space cadre members are currently assigned throughout the National Security Space arena, including the National Reconnaissance Office, National Security Space Architect, National Security Space Integration, MILSATCOM Joint Program Office, as well as in all Navy organizations that deal with space.