It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Text-- On May 1st, 1975, two Zeta Reticulan Greys were demonstrating a 100 percent power-producing annihilation reaction in a relatively small antimatter reactor, to two deep-cover scientists within the tunnels below Area 51, using a super-heavy element, bombarding it with protons. One Ret. Four [a slang term for a resident of the fourth planet of the Zeta II Reticuli system] was doing the display and demanded first that all rifles and especially bullets in them be removed from the room. The elite military guards refused to surrender their weapons, and in the chaotic disorder and commotion that ensued, one alien, two scientists and forty-one military personnel were killed, simply because the colonel in charge of security questioned the Grey's orders. One witness to the scene survived. All the humans had died of head wounds and resultant damage of brain matter. Since no weapon was seen by this witness, the author suggested that the Greys might be able to use their minds as weapons, in essence using their brains as a bio-chemical circuit board through which to channel electromagnetic energy via specific neural patterns or pathways. This may explain, he suggests, why the Greys have the ability to walk or phase through solid matter, read minds, send mental messages, and are able to lift and float themselves as well as abductees without observable instrumentation. The Groom war or massacre ended certain exchanges between the Government and the Greys. (Note: Other sources imply that this was only the initial incident in the 'Groom Wars', and that other incidents have since occurred resulting in the deaths or disappearance of aliens and human scientist, workers and military personnel. - Branton)
The Alien "Guests" would remain on earth and the "human guests" would travel to the Alien point of origin for a specified period of time then return, at which point a reverse exchange would be made
Originally posted by mhector3500
reply to post by observe50
i also remember wachting a something in the History Channel about the humans that died from head wounds. supposedly because they refused to leave their guns and the bullets exploded becasue of some force field produced by the aliens.
'EBE 2' (1964-1984) came as part of an exchange program from the third planet of Zeta 1, and resided in a Los Alamos safe house. Reagan supposedly had meetings with EBE 1 & 2
Originally posted by slaveearth
as known the greys are from Zeta Reticuli some 39 light years away..
was there an 12 men exchange program (or any other)
that took place for tech. ? and the greys traveled here(earth) ...how long would it take them..to arrive here for the exchange
i only know of the trek speed ...warp
warp 1 = light speed 1
warp 2 = light speed 8
warp 3 = light speed 27
warp creates a small "bubble" of normal space time. Ships in warp can interact with objects in normal space.
do they use something the same ??
say if you use warp 3..it would take 1.44 years to get there
seeing the published states that the space ships of today do about 12000 mph ??
Thanks for your comnents
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
I would say that space travel could me nearly instantaneous if one is advanced enough.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
I would say that space travel could me nearly instantaneous if one is advanced enough.
If you define "enough" as being advanced enough for this to happen, your statement is automatically true, however it doesn't preclude the possibility that one can never achieve such level of advancement.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
I would say that space travel could me nearly instantaneous if one is advanced enough.
If you define "enough" as being advanced enough for this to happen, your statement is automatically true, however it doesn't preclude the possibility that one can never achieve such level of advancement.
You are very correct, sir.