It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Kanzius, 63, invented a machine that emits radio waves in an attempt to kill cancerous cells while leaving normal cells intact. While testing his machine, he noticed that his invention had other unexpected abilities.
Filling a test tube with salt water from a canal in his back yard, Kanzius placed the tube and a paper towel in the machine and turned it on. Suddenly, the paper towel ignited, lighting up the tube like it was a wax candle.
"Pretty neat, huh?" Kanzius asked WPBF's Jon Shainman.
Kanzius performed the experiment without the paper towel and got the same result -- the saltwater was actually burning.
Kanzius said the flame created from his machine reaches a temperature of around 3,000 degrees Farenheit. He said a chemist told him that the immense heat created from the machine breaks down the hydrogen-oxygen bond in the water, igniting the hydrogen.
The presence of metallic microspheres implies that these metals were once molten, so that surface tension pulled the droplets into a roughly spherical shape. Then the molten droplets solidified in air, preserving the information that they were once molten in the spherical shape as well as chemical information.
Construction workers used cutting torches and thermal lances (lenghts
of pipe filled with aluminium/steel rods and fed with pure O2 - it was lit
by torch and burned at 7000 F) to cut away the steel debris - think that is hot enough to create molten iron and slag particles.
Originally posted by thedman
Construction workers used cutting torches and thermal lances (lenghts
of pipe filled with aluminium/steel rods and fed with pure O2 - it was lit
by torch and burned at 7000 F) to cut away the steel debris - think that is
hot enough to create molten iron and slag particles.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by CB_Brooklyn
There are no pictures of molten metal in the ruins at Ground Zero.
There was no molten metal in the ruins at Ground Zero.
I guess you haven't seen the molten metal that flows from WTC 2 before it fails then? This is the most unethical, disingenious, untruthful pair of sentences I have ever heard. Next to Ferretman2 saying he was there and there were absolutely no explosions.
Originally posted by Sad Lil Alex
man i read your articles... they really didnt seem very trustworthy... or whatever u might call it... but i just didnt like them.. lol... idk...i dont believe alot of the officail stuff... hell (can i say that?) im not even that up to date of this stuff anymore... (nothing new ever seems to appear)
sometimes you have to think.... MAYBE SOMONES TELLING THE TRUTH .... man not everyone in the world is out to make you life suck.... we arent all lying to you... i garuntee you half the people who make those claims of boots melting.... DONT CARE ABOUT THE NATION ENOUGH TO GO WITH A LIE TO COVER IT UP....
comon... im sooo sick of this childish stuff man
Originally posted by talisman
Statemetns like---
If 9/11 was an inside job, the perpetrators obviously have total control of the media.
Are not true, 9/11 could be an inside job without "TOTAL" control of the media. Futhermore the word "MEDIA" is kicked around forgetting that the people that day were part of the MEDIA. In order for the first part of what the OP says to be true then the MEDIA which includes the people would be under "TOTAL" control which then self-refutes his own point since there is no reason to trust him either!
Since he could be under the very control he speaks of!
My guess on the motive on posting this and other things that the 9/11 researchers group does is to try and sow seeds of doubt on everyone practically that the end user is left believing no one.
The fire-figthers saw and reported Molten Metal and that is good enough for me.
[edit on 8-8-2007 by talisman]
Originally posted by CB_Brooklyn
My motive is to get people to use their brains and look at evidence for themselves instead of believing whatever they're told.
Originally posted by Arabesque
Molten Metal: Fact
*snip*
CB, why is it that you try to prove 9/11 was an inside job with fake evidence (no planes, space beams, TV fakery) and cover up the real evidence like molten steel? It's called disinformation.
Originally posted by Arabesque
Construction workers used cutting torches and thermal lances (lenghts
of pipe filled with aluminium/steel rods and fed with pure O2 - it was lit
by torch and burned at 7000 F) to cut away the steel debris - think that is hot enough to create molten iron and slag particles.
True, but it wouldn't explain the abundance of thermite properties, including in the the dust found in an apartment away from the cleanup.
www.journalof911studies.com...
Originally posted by Griff
Given that radio waves can ignite salt water, does this give the energy beam theory more credibility?
The president of Tully Construction of Flushing, NY, said he saw pools of "literally molten steel" at Ground Zero. Bollyn also cites Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, MD, as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack.
A report by Waste Age describes New York Sanitation Department workers moving "everything from molten steel beams to human remains." 2
A report on the Government Computer News website quotes Greg Fuchek, vice president of sales for LinksPoint Inc. as stating:
In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel 3
A Messenger-Inquirer report recounts the experiences of Bronx firefighter "Toolie" O'Toole, who stated that some of the beams lifted from deep within the catacombs of Ground Zero by cranes were "dripping from the molten steel." 4
A transcription of an audio interview of Ground Zero chaplain Herb Trimpe contains the following passage:
True, but it wouldn't explain the abundance of thermite properties, including in the the dust found in an apartment away from the cleanup.
Originally posted by Pootie
The president of Tully Construction of Flushing, NY, said he saw pools of "literally molten steel" at Ground Zero. Bollyn also cites Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, MD, as having seen molten steel in the bottoms of elevator shafts "three, four, and five weeks" after the attack.
A report by Waste Age describes New York Sanitation Department workers moving "everything from molten steel beams to human remains." 2
A report on the Government Computer News website quotes Greg Fuchek, vice president of sales for LinksPoint Inc. as stating:
In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel 3
A Messenger-Inquirer report recounts the experiences of Bronx firefighter "Toolie" O'Toole, who stated that some of the beams lifted from deep within the catacombs of Ground Zero by cranes were "dripping from the molten steel." 4
A transcription of an audio interview of Ground Zero chaplain Herb Trimpe contains the following passage:
[edit on 9-8-2007 by Pootie]
Mod Edit: Shortened Quoted Text
[edit on 9-8-2007 by chissler]
Originally posted by billybob
why would particle beam, or microwave or laser beam weapons NOT produce molten metal? why if thermite was used could a beam weapon not be used in concert with planted bombs?
the presence of molten metal is the presence of extreme heat, and the source of that heat does not change the fact that there was molten metal in the debris pile, and microspheres in the dust.
i agree with judy wood that the cylindrical holes have not been satisfactorily explained by ANY theory, INCLUDING 'space beams', because we don't know if space beam technology even exists at that power ouput.