It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by jprophet420
im not 100% on this, so please someone enlighten me...
the end of the path according to the NTSB was 400 ft above the pentagon? and so this video compensates for that?
someone please steer me in the right direction here, links appreciated.
A small post to tide my swarming readers over until I finish my animation geography analysis; I recently found, for what it’s worth, both the animation and the csv file seem to agree with the official story. This is nothing new, of course, but barring minor variations of whatever significance, and looking at the 320-mile long swathe of land flown over by Flight 77, it’s all a remarkable fit.
frustratingfraud.blogspot.com...
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
CL wrote in his blog:
A small post to tide my swarming readers over until I finish my animation geography analysis; I recently found, for what it’s worth, both the animation and the csv file seem to agree with the official story. This is nothing new, of course, but barring minor variations of whatever significance, and looking at the 320-mile long swathe of land flown over by Flight 77, it’s all a remarkable fit.
frustratingfraud.blogspot.com...
Yet he has failed to directly address this animation demonstrating how incorrect he really is.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
What??? I haven't blogged on it because I've been doing other things. I mean to put a link to it in my video section, and I did link to it in my updated Fetzer rebuttal. I'm sorry, is there something remarkable in there I'm ignoring? If I write about it it's as likely to be a pan, not that I'm in a good position to technically challenge it...
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
I'm sorry, is there something remarkable in there I'm ignoring?
Well since it demonstrates how the data is irreconcilable with the physical damage.......yes.
You report otherwise based on much less credible research.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
I certainly can't see how the aircraft could come in level. I'm definitely in agreement that 5 degrees nose-down attitude is likely.
You'll note also that the ground slopes towards the Pentagon (quite visible in that video). Makes a level approach even harder.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
CL,
I was curious if you understood how descent and bank angles are pertinent to analyzing the flight path particularly as it pertains to the physical damage.
Because your blog only seems to look at the flight path from a 2-dimensional level.
So do you?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
CL,
I was curious if you understood how descent and bank angles are pertinent to analyzing the flight path particularly as it pertains to the physical damage.
Because your blog only seems to look at the flight path from a 2-dimensional level.
So do you?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
CL wrote in his blog:
A small post to tide my swarming readers over until I finish my animation geography analysis; I recently found, for what it’s worth, both the animation and the csv file seem to agree with the official story. This is nothing new, of course, but barring minor variations of whatever significance, and looking at the 320-mile long swathe of land flown over by Flight 77, it’s all a remarkable fit.
frustratingfraud.blogspot.com...