It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Paranoid Duck
As several people already stated, there is money that can be made with hoaxes; books, t-shirts, stickers, website traffic and even movies.
Originally posted by noangels2006
These drone (viral)photos are doing ufology a great harm,in fact any cynical hoax designed to mislead the public should be a criminal matter.
If these companies/persons where fined big money or another fitting punishment that fits the crime then perhaps they wouldnt pump out the CGI ufos.
Originally posted by SuicideVirus
Originally posted by Paranoid Duck
As several people already stated, there is money that can be made with hoaxes; books, t-shirts, stickers, website traffic and even movies.
Not that much. The number of people out there who actually care is extremely small. The maker of the "Bratz" movie will be swimming in dollars, while the purpetrator of a UFO hoax might at the most get enough money to buy a pie. And not a very good pie.
Have you sent anyone any money? I sure haven't. So there's at least two of us who are not paying out. Times that by a couple hundred and you'll have the entire UFO community.
We're talking maybe a rhubarb pie with a burned crust. A day old.
zorgon
Show me a UFO in a polaroid and you have my attention....
Originally posted by lasse
This has been covered. The resi. cgi experts on this forum has credentials enough, look it up. But I mean geez, there were guys reproducing these things like months ago in the original threads.
Originally posted by Cory and Trevor
It seems curious that although he thinks he's got it all figured out he says:
The pictures were more clear than most UFO pictures, and a short video soon made its appearance.
Yet he hasn't figured out the videos were a CGI test done by that Saladshooter dude and obviously not part of the same package of information.
So he loses some credibility in my eyes.
[edit on 26/7/2007 by Cory and Trevor]
. . . cult of the drone . . .