It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Event: Despotism
Event: Harboring Terroists
Event: Weapons Development
Event: Past Criminal Indisgression
Event: Civil Rights Violations
Event: Previous Attacks On US Facilities
Notice I never mentioned 9/11. We had enough to begin operations without 9/11. Clinton and Bush senior had already set precednce as well. Both in Afganistan and Iraq.
Originally posted by piacenza
I was going to post something similar.
Probably the Debunkers that write in this board voted (80-90 percent of them) for Bush.
Originally posted by Griff
So, I am to believe that in '93, one of our intelegence agencies knew this stuff, but were totally incompetant in 2001?
BTW, I have been saying this from day one. I can't believe you people take incompetance as an excuse. If my incompetance led to the deaths of 3,000+ people, I'm sure you ALL would be calling for me to resign.
Originally posted by grover
I do not think that the government was actually involved though.
Why?
For the simple reason that it would have taken a huge number of people to have pulled it off, and the more people involved in a conspiracy, the less likely it will remain a secret and for every person added to the conspiracy the greater the chances it will become exposed. The odds are that someone would have talked by now, if a large number of people (especially from the government) were involved.
If there is a government conspiracy in regards to 9/11 it is to hide the fact that they either totally bungled national security, or that they allowed it to happen.
Originally posted by coven
hmmm... why is it so far fetched to think terrorists really did fly the planes, AND bush LET it Happen????
why do we have to buy into your story of hologram planes flew into hologram buildings with hologram terrorists and hologram passengers, and hologram people jumping out of the holographic burning buildings to not be an idiot???
you do realize 99% of scientific study is based on ANALYTICAL THOUGHT BASED ON EVIDENCE... you have yet to show a thorough analysis of your evidence, you just state what you have interpreted video footage to mean.
this is neither scientific or intelligent.
Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."
NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of the WTC steel for the elements in thermite/thermate would not necessarily have been conclusive. The metal compounds also would have been present in the construction materials making up the WTC towers, and sulfur is present in the gypsum wallboard that was prevalent in the interior partitions.
believe in creationism much?
lol
Coven Out
Originally posted by ShiftTrio
First and foremost, Most CT's for 9/11 do not half their stories straight. H
Originally posted by Pootie
Originally posted by ShiftTrio
First and foremost, Most CT's for 9/11 do not half their stories straight. H
The government does not half [sic] their story straight... Pancakes, zipper "clips", bowing trusses, timelines, and on, and on...
[edit on 24-7-2007 by Pootie]
Originally posted by ShiftTrio
Perhaps, or not. Lightning striking twice in the same spot? Who knows. I think this also has alot to do with not paying attention to what the previous admin had to say about. Remember Condelisa (Spelling) and the memo that got ignored. I would bet its more then a memo they ignored. again just an opinion. But this to me points more to incompetence than government conspiracy IMHO