It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
So the masons will have a list of children, where they live, hair color, age, sex, height, and much more.. A pedophiles dream huh???
With all the child sex porn rings and missing children going into these rings, I would be very leary of putting my child ona list that would help a pedophile pick them out like a sears catalog...
THANKS BUT NO THANKS
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Even though most posters ignored that one of the first things mentioned was that the masonichip would NOT be implanted, but held by the parents in case their child goes missing...It sounds like the first step to have implanted chips come in later. No matter how charitable & altruistic the reasons for such actions, there will be someone to come along & abuse it.
Overall, if anyone tries to implant chips in me or mine, whether it's Masons, Government, Church or anybody, they'll have to wind up implanting our corpses. Far better to become slabs of meat than live like cattle.
[edit on 15-7-2007 by MidnightDStroyer]
Originally posted by KTK
Please note i am not mason bashing, i stongly adhere to the ats respect code. I just would like clarification as to how this works.
Originally posted by thesun
Since there is no real expalanation to the missing children phenomenom, why should they not be chipped, i dont see anything evil or bad about this, the only prblem i see here is data protection.
Originally posted by MikeAtlas
hello,
I run the CHild Id Program for my lodge in NY...
It has nothing to do with any stored info or the alike. Nor does it have to do with micro chipping.
Originally posted by eyewitness86
Hmmm, as a paranoid type I might wonder what chip's are INSIDE the machine instead of if they are inside the people. Perhaps there is software that shunts a copy of every file into a place where only a certain access will allow viewing? Do we really KNOW that these machines are ' clean ' and UNABLE to retain info?
Originally posted by Anubis_4400
also im not trying to say this is a bad thing because it is a good thing. Im trying to say this could lead to bad things.