Bombs going off while the first plane impacts the WTC Video and picture provided.

Originally posted by tyranny22


What scares me the most is that he's signed into effect a Presidential Order that would allow him to take total control of the government if an event occurs in which he can delare a national catasrophe.

People have criticized me for calling him a dictator. Who signs a document that allows a person to assume total power? I call them as I see them.

Let me guess, you must have read this...www.roguegovernment.com...

rougegovernment.com
and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers

hmmm...looks like it says seperate to me....

also i dont understand teeslandlynns connection...talking about JFK...saying bush was at a party with LBJ...can you clarify or warn for off topic, for that?

What I said:

What was more important: JFK to thwart more Nam aggression or
let LBJ and NIXON carry on. The later as JFK Jr would most likely agree.
Where was GW Bush when JFK JR nose dived into the drink?
LBJ had a party before JFK died the next day.

What you wanted to know:

also i dont understand teeslandlynns connection...talking about JFK...saying bush was at a party with LBJ...can you clarify or warn for off topic, for that?

The LBJ party was in The Killers of JFK of some similar movie.
The where abouts of Bush at the 15 hour search for Jr is some point
of suspicion in the JFK Jr video, just to give a touch of conspiracy.

I wanted to demonstrate of how events in the past appear more sinister
when conspiracy theories use them. There appears to be nothing similar to
the past conspiracies, except cause and effect.

Building came down, the course of history is changed.

People are lost, some among conspiratorial circumstances, and the
the course of history is changed.

I just mentioned some hot conspiracy topics.

I can't decide among planes, missiles or UFOs so I settled on explosions
are the only real cause to be investigated in 9/11.

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
What I said:

my apologies....i thought you were just posting about jfk to get attention....i really didnt understand that first post at all....

[edit on 14-7-2007 by wenfieldsecret]

wenfieldsecret

I must have went to the complicated school of writing.

Actually I did go to and extra writing class.
And it started out analyzing 'it was the best of times, it was the worst of times..'
and a good example of writing. Every teacher must have their own way.

Also you do need attention getters. And some logic, but you can logic a
lot of things as 9/11 videos seems to do.

I did one post in the now SAT dropped comparison style, who knows if
that worked. Sorry about dropping extras in there, I had to fill up the post
with something conspiracy minded after exhausting 9/11 thoughts.

Originally posted by Unit541

Actually the video shows the explosion when the plane makes contact with the building, not before.

The word 'Actually' in your response denotes a contention. However, you're statement reflects the exact same point as the portion you quoted, and by implication disagreed with. I'm confused. Piacenza's comment didn't even imply before.

Edited for further commentary

[edit on 7/12/2007 by Unit541]

Blah Blah Blah Blah.Im gonna pick apart your sentence so i feel smart..

Anyway why would bombs go off at the very top.what good would this do in helping to bring down the building?

how come none of the people from the top of the towers mentioned bombs going off when they called their loved ones to say goodbye?....

^ How come firefighters who were at the scene said they did hear bombs going off?

We could play this all day...

Actually the point that there were survivors on the top of the building supports the idea of blasts at the top. If the flames ingulfed the top of the building there wouldn't have been many survivors instead...This actually prooves that a conventional blast went off.

Interesting point, did anyone on top of the towers mention that a plane hid.

They should know above all.

But then people would say the trauma of the moment would.. what..

forget that a plane hit the building.

9/11 TV fakery says the TV witnesses on the ground were actors, it had some examples.

Cell phone records may still be held... gee if some one had a long discussion
about explosions and no plane and no fire ball, where did the plane and
fire ball come from.

Cell phone records are now being erased....

i was tryingto find transcripts of people calling home...but the only name i could find was mellisa harrington.....but apparently....that's the same name as some girl from Lincoln, NE who was busted for public nudity....so those are the only articles popping up....

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Interesting point, did anyone on top of the towers mention that a plane [SIC] hid.

They should know above all.

But then people would say the trauma of the moment would.. what..

forget that a plane hit the building.

9/11 TV fakery says the TV witnesses on the ground were actors, it had some examples.

Cell phone records may still be held... gee if some one had a long discussion
about explosions and no plane and no fire ball, where did the plane and
fire ball come from.

Cell phone records are now being erased....

This is borderline psychosis. Witnesses on the ground are agents. Witnesses on TV are agents. People i've spoken to who STILL have footage on camera phones are agents.


In actuality the whole of New York on that day was replaced with cyborgs who's single purpose is to give credence to all these crackpot theories.
[/satire]

Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
This is borderline psychosis. Witnesses on the ground are agents. Witnesses on TV are agents. People i've spoken to who STILL have footage on camera phones are agents.


In actuality the whole of New York on that day was replaced with cyborgs who's single purpose is to give credence to all these crackpot theories.
[/satire]

crap...this changes everything....that would explain why the pentagon has been giving free awesome prosthetics to vets missing limbs....

i always knew that new yourkers were cold and stiff.....

Originally posted by deltaboy
Let me guess, you must have read this...www.roguegovernment.com...

no, but thanks for the link. I'll check it out as soon as I get time.

[edit on 16-7-2007 by tyranny22]

double post?!

[edit on 16-7-2007 by tyranny22]

triple post?! WTF?

[edit on 16-7-2007 by tyranny22]

Aren't cell phone records being kept.

Did not people stand at the "plane crash" openings.

Did not interviews take place with actors.

If anything contrary to the Illuminati plan for WTC distruction by
demolition were to be hinted at, it would not be aired.

Non involved interviewers interject their own Illuminati feed opinion.

Government workers were in the majority in that area.

There is reason to doubt the original trauma feed mind psychosis of
the 'official' reasons because is the trauma fed mind psychosis
of the masses that are the 'official' story.


There is a Velikovsky Twist here for bad psychology or is it related
to the Nazi bold use of getting away with it cause we are dong it.

The use of trauma driven mass hypnosis... Velikovsky.. Nazis... 9/11.. ?








[edit on 7/16/2007 by TeslaandLyne]

Bush declares that in the event of a “Catastrophic Emergency” the President will be entrusted with leading the activities to ensure constitutional government. The language in this directive would in effect make the President a dictator in the case of such an emergency.

Bush takes over as watch dog of the Constitution.

So in Katrina this would mean nothing.. FEMA would still be in charge.

The President is sworn to carry out the Constitution.

This means nothing but wasted rhetoric and printed mind games.