It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THENEO
I think you missed the point to this story:
the real crime in the minds of the controllers is this innocent statement,
'and schools her son at home.'
Originally posted by THENEO
yeah, that is true but what could she have said that would cause them alarm?
maybe they asked her who it was for and she refused to tell them?
how did they track her to the purchase? did she willingly give her name and address and was known to them or did they investigate the method of payment (invasion of privacy)?
Originally posted by McGotti
Originally posted by THENEO
yeah, that is true but what could she have said that would cause them alarm?
maybe they asked her who it was for and she refused to tell them?
how did they track her to the purchase? did she willingly give her name and address and was known to them or did they investigate the method of payment (invasion of privacy)?
True...actually I was just thinking about that..it does seem a little odd..even if she told the cashier her child was home schooled and she wanted a flight simulator game...is that really a legal reason to call the police and the police to go to her home and investigate?? maybe the FBI might check it out but a state trooper?? shouldnt he be out looking for speeders on the highway and not checking up on suspicious store purchases at the local stapels...
This does seem a little wierd..
[Edited on 9-1-2004 by McGotti]
Originally posted by THENEO
the real crime in the minds of the controllers is this innocent statement,
'and schools her son at home.'