It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
The moon cameras had magazines that held 120 shots if I remember correctly. And those numbers look like they were added when the paper was exposed. I'm not sure what the anomaly here is? Could someone point it out and leave all the comedic commentary like the OP had out of it?
Originally posted by PsykoOps
I know when handling and archiving a large amount of photos a number catalogue is best.
And the number of photos, I remembered wrong, it was 160 color or 200 b/w.
Originally posted by Badge01
Originally posted by PsykoOps
The moon cameras had magazines that held 120 shots if I remember correctly. And those numbers look like they were added when the paper was exposed. I'm not sure what the anomaly here is? Could someone point it out and leave all the comedic commentary like the OP had out of it?
Comedic though it may be, your post appears to be free of any facts. 'If I remember...', 'look like they were...', tells us nothing.
Why would they add a number to the photo? That tells me the photo is 'retouched', i.e. content added after the exposure.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
What are those strange green lines in the image at the low center, pointing towards the rovers wheel? Dirt, markers, bad scanner? Why weren't those retouched when these were scanned... Not a smoking gun or anything that would suggest a hoaxed moon landing, might as well be sloppy scanning.
[edit on 30/6/2007 by PsykoOps]
Originally posted by flice
You do know that even camera film today has numbers on it? It's for indexing purposes, nothing too strange about that.
[edit on 30/6/07 by flice]
Originally posted by PsykoOps
What are those strange green lines in the image at the low center, pointing towards the rovers wheel? Dirt, markers, bad scanner? Why weren't those retouched when these were scanned... Not a smoking gun or anything that would suggest a hoaxed moon landing, might as well be sloppy scanning.
[edit on 30/6/2007 by PsykoOps]
Originally posted by webstra
As i questioned here :
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Can anybody tell me why there are no links anymore to the pictures of apollo 17 ?
history.nasa.gov...