It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Camilo1
Hi lasee
Well, I really hope that Sanchez Phd is right... (by the way I`m far from Phd)
But something tells me that he is just not.
Think about the "ingress video", or the coordinates that Rutledge gave, that are just the same as NASA did. Think about the footage that Rutledge gave inside the spaceship, there is an italian journalist that has tried to proove/disproove whatever Rutledge has said and so far he appears to be somewhat genuine.
I am certainly not saying that Rutledge is right, I really don`t now, but saying that he is a hoax because he has some other e-mail adreeses and because he purchased some NASA pictures is just not plausible.
Hope you respond
respectfully
Camillo
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
The thing I find really irritating about this whole retiredafb debate is that it distracts people from the facts that are known, with what is for all intents and purposes, an unverifiable claim. Whether retiredafb's story is true or false is really just a diversion for me. What really interests me about this whole claim is that;
1, There is a large and unusual object on the moon.
2, It looks completely out of place and there is no apparent geological or natural way for it to have come to be where it is.
3, NASA seem to be completely uninterested in investigating the object, or it's origins and context.
Everyone is busy debating and speculating on the finer points and feasibility of an Apollo 20 mission and the pros-cons of faking a video when what they should be discussing is WTF the object in the NASA photo's actually is.
It's there! It's real! It's of unknown origin! What the hell is it and why hasn't anyone gone to have a look at it since the photo's were originally taken? It's probably only one of the greatest anomalies in near Earth space yet it's been swept under the rug and igonred... WTF?
Originally posted by rembrandtA2
reply to post by lasse
The story is hoax but the videos look real.
Why?
Have you asked your self a question: how they would be able to communicate with Huston if they are on the back side of a moon. Have we had an communication network of satellites around the moon at that time.
Do we have that network now?
So if these videos are real they are taken on our side of moon, not on the back.
This puts an other question: Who has made this hoax story and why?
Originally posted by rembrandtA2
reply to post by dodgygeeza
That is nice and clear
but how does this transition fit in the back side of the moon and Apollo 20 story?
www.revver.com...
Originally posted by kidflash2008
This hoax will never die! I think people would notice a huge Saturn V rocket (which is more than twice the height of the shuttle) lifting off. They would also be able to see it. I was stationed at Vandenberg AFB for a brief time, and they had a night time launch of a much smaller rocket. It was quite noticeable.