It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Siddharta
reply to post by tomiuk
So you are the 4th man.
Than you also know my real name and what I posted at last.
Congratulations, since I read, you are not only an expert in copyright laws, but also in CGI. Kris looked like a little child beside you.
Originally posted by Siddharta
reply to post by tomiuk
So you are the 4th man.
Than you also know my real name and what I posted at last.
Congratulations, since I read, you are not only an expert in copyright laws, but also in CGI. Kris looked like a little child beside you.
Originally posted by Siddharta
No, I don't. And if you now ask about Stephen King... He is one of the worst authors of our time...
Even doghead was better.
[edit on 11-4-2008 by Siddharta]
Originally posted by Siddharta
Err.. Hope you don't mean it how it sounds: Burry me beneath the willow.
I like this song very much, but I don't want to be burried yet. Who would answer your posts then?
No news from the detectives, as I suggest. Nice weekend to them, btw.
Edit: English-teacher: "Be! You must say BE BURRIED! Now write down a hundred times: "I will BE burried!"
Wow! You are right, dear! It is early morning already! Crazy we's!
[edit on 11-4-2008 by Siddharta]
Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by tomiuk
I'm a qualified electrical engineer amongst other things but I'm lost here as to any relevance ?
Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by Sys_Config
Hi Sys,
To be honest the answer to your query is pretty much that I can't add anything. My background is heavy current rather than microelectronic and whilst all fields are based in common principle there are a myriad of specialisations, the ones you touch on I have no expertise in at all, other than being able to understand the basic prinicples.
The only thing I can mention, which I think I said very early on, was that I felt the Isaac documents phrasing indicated input from someone with an electrical background, which did fit with the author's claims.
The LAP also "feels" as if it has some base in semi-conductor / transistor circuit design and logic, although more organic in nature, almost like a neural path map. To me it fits very well with it's alleged purpose from a human perspective, which only makes sense from a reverse engineering / exotic technology explanation. Or hoax of course.
Reply #129 on: January 04, 2008, 03:46:25 AM »
I read about Daniel some years ago. Did not realize he gave demonstrations. This shows me some credibility. I am showing my esoteric side but it would not be much of a supprise to me if it was his consciousness that energized his circuits. I suppose William Tiller would call it psychoenergetics: www.tillerfoundation.com...
Princeton shows how consciousness effects their EGGs in a global way: noosphere.princeton.edu...
Then you can take it a step further and take a look at the Isaac Drone information: isaaccaret.fortunecity.com... There he gets into how they figured the alien antigravity devices worked by thought. The beings would merely focus their attention on the hieroglyphs on the machine and through some sort of exotic nanotech the machine would provide the correct response. Although I would hate to see Daniel used as a lab rat but it would be interesting to know if he possess an advancement in his genes or perhaps he has a higher brain wave activity. Maybe a safer solution would be someone else using their own psychoenergetics to try to energise his circuits under a double blind system.
For someone to put together coils like that which respond to his thoughts perhaps it is like he is channeling with a higher entity or maybe a higher 'self' when he is building these circuits.
Anyway just some 'thoughts' as I find this stuff fascinating. I believe we may be heading down this path some day in the future. We are over due for a new paradym in my opinion. Smiley
Take care.
Let The Speculation Begin
As for myself personally, it appears that the devices are not half as interesting as the inventor. This is not to say that there is nothing about the devices that is of interest, however. Even so, the available facts, and the subsequent observations just made, seem to me to suggest that it is the inventor who is far more interesting than anything that he has built.
Just look at what we have: (1) non-planar circuit couplings of an unknown nature; (2) an unknown source of power; (3) scaleability (and hence order); (4) room-temperature superconduction (indicating spin alignment phenomena, space-time and zero-point phenomena, etc.); and (5) quantum entaglement with living systems. Items 2 and 5 (and hence 4) point directly to the inventor. But what about the devices? Well...they are clearly outputs. The thing is, it would appear that the inventor is the "input."
A Trial Explanation -- Not Set In Stone
Allow me to begin by explaining my views of certain aspects of living systems (that is, us) that I think bear on the solution to this problem of the "Spooky Tech" devices.
We have senses with which we interact with the physical world. This physical world, in turn, can be described as a sort of "mass-energy hologram." (See a book entitled, "The Holographic Universe" by Michael Talbot.) Our senses provide us with a map of the universe not only as it is, but how it unfolds: our sense of "time." This, in turn, provides us with "memory."
I would note, however, that "memory" is not something we store in our brains, or our body cells, as many think. Rather, we are "storing" a space-time map of our sensory input, and the universe itself IS our memory, exactly as we experience it. Simply put, using the most dense possible method of data storage, namely binary, we do not have enough atoms in our brains to remember even a few days worth of experiences. Yet, laboratory studies confirm time and again that we remember everything we experience.
Hence, we have a quantum-level space-time linkage in our brains and bodies. (Recent experiments have revealed that "memory phenomena" are associated with our individual organs and tissues. Specifically, this has been observed with transplant patients studied for the express purpose of determining how "cellular-level memory" works.)
Originally posted by Siddharta
reply to post by tomiuk
Since you are in direct contact with Linda, maybe you could find out, why she excluded the interview with Arthur.
Asking him about it, I only got that rather confusing answer:
"I don't know which show you refer to. WWW.unknowncountry.com &
www.earthfiles.com are both doing great. "
Maybe it was due to my bad Chinese...
Originally posted by murnut
OMG...I can't believe that LMH has never even had the photo's analyzed by any kind of expert.
What kind of Investigative reporter is she?
The sham kind.
Obviously, she does not want the truth.
She is completely incompetent or complicit in the hoax, in my opinion.
The only High Strangeness going on is her inexplicable actions.
Could she really be this derelict?
Could she be in on it?
Does she have suspicions of a hoax and won't allow the info out to confirm?
It is bad enough, to fight disinfo and govt cover ups, but she is supposed to be one of our own, she is supposed to be on our side.
LMH is only out for herself
What a disgrace!
So, appeals to reason and the "do the right thing" will continue to fall to the wayside Mur. Yes, I want to hurl at those people protecting LMH, despite no connection they claim to her, yet have a "one on one" rapport with her. on the phone frequently, and getting witnesses for her!. or Tomi was on research groups intitiated at the start, not disclosing that to their own membership, or that Tomi is a CGI expert herself (think about that)then lying as to where the pdf came from claiming she found it by accident, and nemo not remembering at all? Then lying last night to Sidd how to Join? Even Catweazel, Umberto Eco could not come close to this comedy.