It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fairview, Tennessee, June 13, 2007 – Our dire need for a new source of inexpensive, pollution-
free energy to free us from our dependency on foreign oil may have been met by a scientist in
Tennessee. A new extremely inexpensive, pollution-free source of electricity has been discovered
and is now being considered by major international corporations. This new technology produces
electricity without chemical reactions, combustion or pollution. Mechanical energy generated by
the powerful magnetic forces of neodymium magnets (manufactured by Hitachi Corporation) turns
electric generators producing electricity. A volume of neodymium magnets less than the size of a
car battery can generate (for decades) more than enough electricity to supply an average
household and an amount equivalent to thousands of gallons of gasoline a year.
This source of pollution-free energy can do more than provide inexpensive electricity. It can be
used to affordably generate other forms of energy such as hydrogen and to produce pure water
from ocean water for drinking and farming.
Pulling two magnets apart along the same path
they took to pull themselves together will of course require as much (or more) energy as the
amount generated by the magnets when they come together. However, it has been discovered
recently that two permanent magnets of a particular shape can be pulled apart along a prescribed
path that requires less work compared to the amount of work produced when the magnets come
together along a different path. This is possible because permanent magnets have at least one
North and one South Pole which gives polarity to their magnetic fields making the fields and the
force in the field unevenly distributed. In an uneven field of magnetic force, it is not difficult to
imagine different paths having different forces and thereby generating different amounts of work.
The paths that must be followed came as a surprise and were not intuitive. For example, it has
been discovered that two cube-shaped neodymium magnets (measuring .75”, 43 pound pull-force,
Grade N38, 1.8 ounces) are capable of generating 7.46 inch-pounds (work) when they pull
themselves together “sideways” in the horizontal plane. It takes only 6.56 inch-pounds to pull the
magnets apart along a vertical path that is perpendicular to the path they followed when they
came together. This leaves a .90 inch-pound net-yield of mechanical energy (work) which can be
used for example to turn an electric generator
The premise and method (described in the abstract below and in the attached report)
for harvesting mechanical energy is, although unintuitive, very simple and straightforward:
magnets are capable of doing more work in one direction (or plane) than another, and the net
difference can be used to turn a generator or perform other tasks. I have no doubt that a net-
yield of mechanical energy is available as described. Only the size of the yield remains in
question and is a matter of the accuracy of my measurements. However, it is not that difficult to
measure force over distance. Verification of my measurements can be done very easily and
inexpensively. I have confirmed my calculations (both simple geometry and integral) with
mathematics and physics professors.
Originally posted by Freezer
Turning a rotor by magnets has already been done.
www.youtube.com...
This is not the answer to the energy problem in my opinion. Steven Marks torriodal power unit is all we need to power everything, from the zero point energy field. Until the suppression on free energy ends, we will never see such devices in the public realm.
Originally posted by NGC2736
Now I haven't done anything except read this thread, but the idea seems simple enough. And it will be tested, many times, I'm sure.
I think the key, the way that will bypass the oil companies, is simplicity. When a method is found that is simple enough for a farmer in Africa or a hillbilly mechenic in the Ozarks to build, they will.
The real test is an item/idea that the poor can grasp, that they can modify in their basement, of put on a lawnmower, or power a water pump with. The big boys won't give away technology, and if it's too hard to cobble together, the needy won't be able too.
If/when we get a revolution in energy, it will be like the early days of the automobile or the airplane, it will be something that can be accomplished by the backyard tinkerer.
And when that happens, the big oil companies won't stand a chance of stopping it. Oh, they'll try to get safety laws passed that make it a hazard,or something, but once it's out there, and people can save big money, so many people will be doing it that enforcement would totally fail.
I see that as the only way we'll break the grip of the fat cats.
Originally posted by Freezer
Something simple? Overunity isn't possible? I present Mr. Milkovic
12x times more in than out.
www.veljkomilkovic.com...
Have a look at this.
video.google.de...
- Connect this to a generator, then power the pedulum with the generator and there you go, an overunity device everyone here could build with $50.
I still Steven Marks device is all we need for huge power output contained in a small package which has no moving parts. Its the best overunity device I've seen. It seems like it could last as long as the parts maintain, which could be hundred of years.
Originally posted by Freezer
He is going to do this. He actually just got finished building that. Even the admin of the ou site suggested a good idea by using a electro magnet to pulse the pendulum back and forth which would take less energy. I think this is a very simply to make device which could yield a usable amount of energy given how good the generator is.
This is not the answer to the energy problem in my opinion.
I think the key, the way that will bypass the oil companies, is simplicity. When a method is found that is simple enough for a farmer in Africa or a hillbilly mechenic in the Ozarks to build, they will.
The real test is an item/idea that the poor can grasp, that they can modify in their basement, of put on a lawnmower, or power a water pump with. The big boys won't give away technology, and if it's too hard to cobble together, the needy won't be able too.
Just sounds like so much of the "free energy" horse hockey I've heard over the years...
Something simple? Over unity isn't possible? I present Mr. Milkovic
12x times more in than out.
www.veljkomilkovic.com...
Have a look at this.
video.google.de...
- Connect this to a generator, then power the pedulum with the generator and there you go, an overunity device everyone here could build with $50.
still Steven Marks device is all we need for huge power output contained in a small package which has no moving parts. Its the best over unity device I've seen. It seems like it could last as long as the parts maintain, which could be hundred of years.
Originally posted by Heckman
You can of course ask me why I don't believe it and I will tell you. People are not always honest and measurements are not always accurate. Therefor I will not believe it blindly without witnessing directly or indirectly some form of proof that can be duplicated by anyone with the means to do so.
Originally posted by Freezer
Turning a rotor by magnets has already been done.
www.youtube.com...
This is not the answer to the energy problem in my opinion. Steven Marks torriodal power unit is all we need to power everything, from the zero point energy field. Until the suppression on free energy ends, we will never see such devices in the public realm.
vLan said...
I actually emailed them from their website and got a reply today. My email was like this:
Dear Dr Kozeka,
I'm very excited about your new generator and I want to congratulate you for successfully commercializing it.
I've gone through your ppt and I have a question. What is the amount of work needed to bring the moving magnet back to its original position, so that the cycle can be started again?
Is it less than the 'yield'? If so, have you done any measurements? What methods are you using for continuous yields? If there is any patents kindly provide a link.
I'm eager to place an order for a sample/demo unit. Thank you.
The reply:
Thank you for your interest in the Eden Project.
Please click on this link
www.kedroncorp.com... to download
the full research report.
My discovery concerns a source of new energy. There is no machine. The magnets will however drive a machine that will include an electric generator.
The report which you can obtain from the link above explains that the amount of energy required to separate the magnets is less than the amount generated when the come together (along a different path). Once they have been pulled apart, the amount of energy (work) required to move the magnets back to their starting position is very small provided friction is kept at a minimum.
The mentioned report is entirely about measurements.
Please know that there are no prototypes or demos. A new pollution free, abundant, and virtually free source of mechanical energy has been discovered.
Once again, thank you for your interest.
Sincerely,
Kenneth C. Kozeka, Ph.D.
President
KEDRON CORPORATION
615.618.3804
So note that there is nothing so far, only measurements. No free energy machines yet...
At least the guy was honest in telling that, unlike steorn, who claims to have working machines, even the one with 550 bhp output ..LOL
Free energy is a loose term, and what I meant is that you should see a gain due to the gravity working for you with the pendulum. Thats the point, not the lever. The lever just amplifies the effect. I don't really believe energy comes from nothing even if its being pulled out of the "aether," its still coming from somewhere.
And yes I actually was thinking about making one, as I don't have the parts in my garage atm. I like to think about it first and try and see the best parts and materials which could be used. For instance I'm sure theres a more efficient way to connect the arm to a generator.
. Have you even looked at the replication progress so far on the site? I'm sure someone would go through all that trouble of hoaxing those videos from the 1980's then release them 20 years later, creating fake patents, cordinating it with forum members in contact with him to agree with false data, create their own false replications and spread false data within the forum. In my opinion this isn't likely. More likely it does exactly what he claims it does, which is why people have made the progress they've have made thus far on their replications.
Its good to be skeptical, but not to the point that you don't even give it a chance or look simply because a hundred other people haven't replicated it. I'm glad people over at that forum have invested their time in decoding this device, and it was sought out just on faith that it could be real.
You suggest im guilty of believing in just any old device which claims free energy, but on the other side you deny something you haven't taken the time to understand. Look through the 100's of pages on that forum dedicated SM threads and tell me its all bs. If you can find the compliation of Steven Marks emails to a forum member, you will understand it a whole lot better, as he gives his insight and concepts of the device. Thats what really convinced me that his device works and is real. Read his words and you will understand that this guy is pretty dam insightful and brilliant
It turns out that they actually have nothing, its all papers.