It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We do not have such a government. From the president to the legislature they have demonstrated they do not have the political ability. They seem gutless for some reason. It seems that anyone who would stand up and say "we will stop the onslot, whatever it takes!" would receive incredible support. Have you noticed that the democratic congress has 14% support by the public currently and the Bush administration has similar approval? Ever wonder why?
What we need is a government that is willing to enforce the laws we already have.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by intrepid
I think you just described the Berlin Wall.
The Berlin Wall was erected by the East German Communists to keep East Germans from fleeing the horrible oppression of totalitarianism.
The wall or barrier proposed by Americans for our boarders is intended to keep others from entering our country illegally.
There's a huge difference.
I'm not sure why a Canadians should care one way or the other.
[edit on 2007/6/21 by GradyPhilpott]
The people building the wall would be legal immigrants or they would not be hired. Legals in general do not favor open boarders and unlimited illegals coming in, ie. they want the illegals stopped like you and I do! Hispanics in my experience are great construction workers and would do a good job.
Can you imagine the "quality" job that they would do in making a huge wall that would keep out their friends and family?
Originally posted by plumranch
Hispanics in my experience are great construction workers and would do a good job.
I think you are correct but those are just problems for management to handle with building standards and inspections.
by whatukno
may be a few undocumented holes in the wall when all was said and done.
Sounds good. Would a 1/4 to 1/2 mile swath of vegitation and obstruction have to be cleared for these systems to work?
By wingman77:
How about a system of interspersed automated detection stations? They could employ thermal, acoustic, and visual sensors and tracking systems.
Originally posted by thesun
Do you realise how much this will cost the tax payers, instead the money should be use to improve health care
Originally posted by intrepid
Thanks for showing what is wrong in America though. If it ain't American, it don't matter.
Originally posted by intrepid
"the land of the caged and the home of the scared."
Hi! OP here, I stated in one of my opening posts that our political elements would probably not allow this wall/fense to cause anyone intentional injury. Our posters seem to like the "armed wall" idea, however! I like the heavily monitored vs. heavily armed version myself.
by Don Wahn:
It seems to me that this is basically saying, in the future, if you try to enter our country as an illegal, we will kill you before you even make it halfway
Forgot to ask you what systems would best identify and filter out wildlife if that is possible? I'm NW rather that SW but I suppose wildlife would include lots of coyotes, dogs, cats, crows, buzzards, horses, cows, calves, deer, yetti (woops, probably not!), wild and domestic pigs. A pretty good range of body sizes and shapes!
By wingman77:
hermal imaging and acoustic senors shouldn't be impeded by foliage I'd imagine. If the LRAD and ADS systems were elevated above the brush it shouldn't impede their effect.
Originally posted by thesun
Originally posted by plumranch
The Wall is the only effective solution to stop the flood of illegals. The question is what type of construction would be effective? Should it be tall, thick, go deep into the ground, be a double wall, have loads of monitoring equipment on it, have guards posted? What would work? What did the Isrealis build?
Do you realise how much this will cost the tax payers, instead the money should be use to improve health care
Hi! OP here, I stated in one of my opening posts that our political elements would probably not allow this wall/fense to cause anyone intentional injury. Our posters seem to like the "armed wall" idea, however! I like the heavily monitored vs. heavily armed version myself.
Originally posted by whatukno
Do you know what is hilarious about all of this?
Where do you think the workers that are supposed to be building this wall would come from?
I mean seriously, if such a wall was to be built they would use Mexican labor to build it. If you go to any construction site, nearly half of the workers are Mexican/south American. Can you imagine the "quality" job that they would do in making a huge wall that would keep out their friends and family?
Good point, I agree. Now go convince Boxer, Feinstein, Hillary, etc. Even conservative republicans do not want to appear like mean old Americans with the armed wall issue. They're a bunch of wimps.
Groingrinder:
I prefer to let people know that WE are the ones who control the border, not armed Mexican paramilitary, drug lords, gangs, and coyotes