It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sarah Cohen
There are only two possibilities. Either Bush and the Entire Congress and the FBI and Popular Mechanics and the 911 Commission and Television Journalists and the New York Times and the Washington Post are telling the truth, as has been proven time and again, or else people were fooled by holograms that created the explosions on 9/11 and were used to plant the evidence as is claimed by this disinfo trash:
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
There were no holograms, and there wasn't any TV fakery. TV fakery doesn't work for those who were watching it for real.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
How can you be so sure that "everyone" did infact see a plane smash into the tower? You are saying something which you can not back up, given that there is evidence against planes being used. You can not state conclusively that people saw the plane when they were the ones experiencing the moment, and not you.
Are you willing to state that you believe it's possible that this could be the case? Put another way, which would you say is more likely - at least one account/image of a plane is accurate or all of them are inaccurate?
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
People trust the TV. Need i say anymore?
Originally posted by coughymachine
Actually, yes. This isn't just about what people say they saw (including some here at ATS), but also about what individuals photographed and videotaped. You have to be prepared to say that every single eyewitness account was wrong or fabricated; that every single photograph is a fake; that every video is fake (the 'live' broadcasts having been faked in real time); that the impact holes were faked; and that all the debris was planted.
Originally posted by coughymachine
You're also assuming that everyone reading this and sharing their opinion agrees with you that no plane hit the Pentagon and that no plane crashed at Shanksville.
Originally posted by Sarah Cohen
Either Bush and the Entire Congress and the FBI and Popular Mechanics and the 911 Commission and Television Journalists and the New York Times and the Washington Post are telling the truth
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
They are not necessarily wrong. There may well have been a plane in the vincinity of Manhattan.. there was the whitejet flying over the Whitehouse, caught on camera by a Spanish news crew. Some may have seen a plane, but through TV had the belief reinforced that the plane they saw hit the tower etc.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
Debris was most certainly planted, given the obviousness that it was done at both the Pentagon and Shanksville also.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
Impact holes lol.. funny how a plane can slice neatly through steel beams..
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
I am prepared to believe that 9/11 was the biggest mass media deception of mankind.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
It fits with something in the bigger picture also, the "endgame" scenario, in a special way that i will not go into detail here, as that is a relatively new conclusion that i have established.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
If they do think a plane crashed in that Shanksville field then they are either deluding themselves, or if they believe it wholeheartedly then they are retarded. There is simply no way that a Boeing crashed in that field, end of story. You either see it, or you don't. Look at the pictures. Enough said.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
And the Pentagon.. again, look at the pictures. Examine the flightpath/s. Examine the damage supposedly caused by the Boeing. Yet again, you either recognise the fact that no Boeing crashed there, or you don't.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
I will accept that some people think a missile or smaller plane crashed, but only because they are looking to fill the holes in their argument, and have yet to realise they are being misled by the very people they are trying to fight against..
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
The CCTV release of the Pentagon "impact".. Rumsfeld "shoot down" leak..
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
You think they were coincidences? They give you just enough evidence so you can jump to a conclusion, but not enough so that you can unravel the truth of the matter.