It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skynetshield
So you're saying it's better to stay to ourselves than to see what's out there. We could bring our demise if some malicious or indifferent lifeform decides we're useless or nuisances. I'd personally prefer the arrival of something but wouldn't welcome any negative consequences from it. IMO these signals from SETI are pointless. If some extraterrestrial life does arrival and makes its presence known it'll be for some other reason not because SETI is yelling over some cup and string.
Originally posted by yeti101
skynetsheild, why do you think Aliens are suddenly going to arrive at earth if we send a signal? if they had the tech to get here they would already have arrived.
Originally posted by yeti101
also your statement "Obviously Seti must be doing something right if they only get 1 signal "is seriously flawed, SETI has had no dedicated telecscopes in its history.
Originally posted by yeti101
Some folks in SETI think we should be blasting out a signal now in the hope someday someone will intercept it.
....
Should we start singnaling to the other earth type planets we find? what should we say?
Or should we wait until we directly detect another civilization with our own intruments - (leaked radio/tv radar signals) if we do detect leaked signals we know theres definitley someone there.
or do you think we should never send one - too dangerous?
[edit on 13-6-2007 by yeti101]