It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Aren't we about "scheduled" for temperature increases leading into the next ice age cycle?
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Technically, if that's the case, it would be accounting for it. Understanding it would then be what we're tying to do.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I'm not prepared to do that yet. So far we have several holes in the data of 'both sides'. But really, if ice ages are a continuing pattern, and it's about that time, it's peraps the worlds attention should be in trying to understand the ice age process itself. That would be a mechanism.
Originally posted by melatonin
You can actually check the cosmic ray data yourself:
ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov...
There is no trend, just the normal cycles.
Originally posted by Essan
Sorry to labour the point, but so far no-one has offered any proof that man isn't causing global warming
Unless you can show that human activity is incapable of affecting the climate, or that other variables - solar for example - can explain all[/b[ observed changes (thus leaving no room for human involvement) then I think one has to conclude that it cannot be proven that man is not responsible.