It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And I refuse to accept any longer, a theory that requires me to believe that lightweight aluminum aircraft, can fly right through steel reinforced concrete buildings, and the media is somehow now trustworthy.
Can you show me one example of that occurring other than the fake 911 footage?
I am just asking politely. Is it possible, that you are just not yet able, to shake off media conditioning?
Originally posted by selfless
Spawwwn,
Your post is irrelevant with what I was saying.
I was not talking about velocity, I was talking about the material the plane is constructed with.
Of course velocity plays a part. It also plays a part when a bird trashes completely the nose cone or the wings of a plane.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
And again, you're looking at the SKIN, and ignoring the internal structure of the plane. The main spars of a plane are SIGNIFICANTLY heavier and stronger than the skin of the plane. What you're saying is that ONLY the skin is hitting the building, and there's no way that it can go through.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
This is the center wing section of a 777. Look at what's UNDER the skin. You can't see the main spars, but you can see that there's quite a bit of framing under the skin that's pretty solid. THAT is what penetrated the buildings. You can't say "The skin is super thin aluminum so there's no way a plane can go through the buildings." You're completely IGNORING the internal structure.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You keep saying "thin skin" and completely IGNORE everything UNDER the skin.
Originally posted by selfless
Ridiculing theories is not denying ignorance.
Originally posted by Crakeur
Originally posted by selfless
Ridiculing theories is not denying ignorance.
I'm not denying ignorance, I'm merely not acknowledging insanity
how can anyone rationally argue that all of us in NYC that sat and stared didn't see what we saw? that a handfull of people watching on the tv are right and the folks that WERE THERE AND SAW IT ALL, WITHOUT THE TV, are wrong?
do you have any idea how moronic that sounds? deny ignorance? no, deny stupidity.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Then please selfless, if they're strong enough to penetrate the buildings, HOW am I over exaggerating how strong they are?
Originally posted by selfless
I am just a person like all of you who keeps an open mind and won't ridicule a theory even if it doesn't' fit my agreement perception.
Originally posted by Spawwwn
It was a comment to disprove the general idea that the plane would not have been strong enough, to be able to cut the steel.
Originally posted by Crakeur
Originally posted by selfless
I am just a person like all of you who keeps an open mind and won't ridicule a theory even if it doesn't' fit my agreement perception.
so then you are willing to accept the possibility of a soul catcher on the far side of the moon? willing to not only accept the possibility but to actually be able to argue in its favor?
it's one thing to say holograms are possible. it's a totally different one to say that a hologram was produced that was visible from every conceivable angle in the area and that every single person was fooled except for 6 or so people, one of whom (bsregistration) claims to have a girlfriend who was not duped by the hologram and actually saw a missile.
yeah, that's the ticket.