It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(1) Invasion of privacy by intrusion into private affairs
This right is violated when someone discloses private or sensitive matters about a private person. It covers matters that occur in private places, and also in semi-private settings where the individual had a reasonable expectation that she was seen only by a limited group of people. For example, this right is violated when a news reporter secretly videotapes a conversation with an employee at her place of work, even though her fellow employees witnessed the conversation.
In your example, the gallery might be considered such a semi-private setting. However, your husband's mere physical appearance at the opening would not qualify as a “private” or “sensitive” matter. So the act of taking his photograph, and/or disclosing what he looks like in the subsequent painting, would not violate the intrusion right of privacy. If he had been documented doing something of a sensitive nature, such as embracing another woman, that would be a different story.
.not to mention it was taken in a private residence which you entered at your own will,
Originally posted by TheBadge
hey thanks for looking up stuff!! well he wrote that they are lesbians for the comments of the picture which is not true.. but yeah thank you!!!! we have yet to see if hes going to take it down or what.
she posted a picture of me and dissed it to the ground and messed about with it on photoshop etc. i asked her to take it down and she would be like ' i would of if you asked me nicely but you've been a jerk about so no' etc. even though i wasn't.
hahaha i know right! just cuz she threatend to make it a legal issue boo hoo all i have to say is YOU SHOULD HAVE ASKED PERMISSION plain and simple.
He feels disrespected? poor guy...