posted on Dec, 22 2010 @ 08:37 PM
Well, there are persons who can barely breathe and they never smoked anything. Poor genes, many factors contribute. I can see no reason for the
coincidence of bad lungs and cannabis use to even be noteworthy. I bet there are tons of people with emphysema who never lived near a city, nor
smoked. I am guessing at this, but I'll bet I am right.
The source of the cannabis should be looked in to. Was it clean, or laced with spice, or synthetic junk? Maybe there were a lot of chemicals
(ferilizer) left in the flowers? Did she smoke from her own supply? Sounds like a play for some lobby group, an old trick, they use it to shut down
the net and anything they can think of. My lungs are good, and I have used tobacco for a long time. They lied to us about tobacco as well...showing
coal miner lungs and saying they were from tobacco users. Also, many lung cancer cases were caused from plutonium because of decades of fervent
nuclear tests. Smoking actually prevented the plutonium from embedding in the tissues in the lungs, saving lives. Nonetheless, smoking is always
blamed in a blanket fashion.
She could have eaten it, vaporized it, cut back on use, taken better care of herself, rather than line up with some lobby to demonize the whole genus.
Better strains mean less is needed. I hate to say it, but there's a lot of garbage because people are unscrupulous. Also, there's really not a lot
of smoke going on with cannabis. It isn't like a cigarette where you use 30 per day, you know?
Will I read her sob story? Perhaps, and if so, it will only be in order to scrutinize the motives of the lobby at the center of this. I know that the
government has got to slander things in order to gain traction. They are up against a huge resistance. We are sick of being poisoned, especially in
thought.