I suspect there are a number of individuals who know a great deal. Just as Mozart was a musical prodigy, it's reasonable to suspect that others have
been spiritual prodigies. However, with knowledge comes wisdom, usually. So those who DO 'know' would feel compelled, most likely, to defer to
organised religions, rather than reveal what they know.
As well, if they knew such a great deal, they may not be interested in attempting to convince the rest of us, over the almost certain opposition from
organised religion and State.
Regardless of how much knowledge they possess, these people most likely only have the same amount of time in a human body. They'd be faced with the
decision about whether to devote that time and energy to perfecting themselves and gaining further knowledge --- or going out to try to educate
everyone else.
They'd be subject to endless scepticism and criticism. Responding to that would be a full-time job.
Organised religion serves a number of purposes: it renders people 'manageable' and socially-responsible, for the large part.
If those with special knowledge revealed, for example, that organised religion is wrong --- what would happen to all those who depend on religion to
get them through? There'd be chaos and confusion. The bottom and meaning of people's lives may well fall out from beneath them. Governments and
police don't really maintain law and order: that's just an illusion made possible after religion has 'programmed' people to behave and believe in
certain ways.
It may be that people are intended to follow a predetermined plan, and revelations from those who actually 'know' what life is all about may not be
part of that plan. So for this reason, they may maintain silence. They may be required to.
Possession of knowledge carries with it certain responsibilities.
Someone of today's age who greatly interests me is Matthew Manning. As a youth, he apparently possessed outstanding psychic abilities. He
experienced the usual psychic phenomena in addition to the extraordinary. For example, he was able to communicate with an entity whose identity was
never revealed by Manning, as far as I'm aware. All Manning publicly revealed was that the entity had claimed medical expertise and was willing to
share some of this with Manning, for the benefit of humans. He prescribed medications (via Manning) which allegedly were highly successful, if
somewhat unorthodox.
In his earlier years and in order to control and direct the overwhelming psychic phenomena to which he was being subjected, Manning was advised to
practise automatic writing. As result, he produced several dozen drawings very much in the style of numerous well-known artists, such as Durer,
Picasso, etc. Manning had little artistic ability, yet he was able to swiftly produce highly-complex works in a variety of widely differing styles,
many of which were 'signed' by the artist, or rather, by what claimed to be the artists' spirits.
Manning was in direct contact with the spirit of a former owner of Manning's parents' home for considerable time, during which numerous 'apports'
were bestowed upon Manning by the spirit. On one occasion, while Manning was being investigated by the Society for Psychic Research and others,
500-plus signatures were written by spirits on Manning's wardrobe doors. Later investigation revealed, according to investigators, that many of the
spirits had lived several centuries before, and were buried in the local churchyard.
In the 1970's approx., Manning wrote a number of books about his experiences and conclusions. Like Monroe, we must suspect that not all was
revealed; maybe not more than a fraction. But what *was* revealed was fascinating. Amongst these was Manning's claim that he'd been in contact
with Frederick Myers, one of the founding members (along with numerous scientists, politicians etc. of the late Victorian era) of the SPR and of Cross
Communications fame. Myers and his co-members had declared, prior to their deaths, that if it were possible, they would communicate with others of
their group in order to prove the reality of Life After Death. Myers and the others reportedly DID establish communication with the living, via a
sophisticated series of messages which, when combined like a jig saw puzzle, spelt out a message from beyond the grave.
According to Manning, Myers (some 70 plus years after his physical death) contacted Manning from beyond the grave. And in reply to Manning's
questions, stated that establishing contact with the living was as difficult as dictating to a deaf secretary from behind a glass wall.
When in adulthood however, Manning ceased to provide information to the public about the spiritual realms, much to my disappointment and that of many
others. Instead (and very nobly) he has devoted his life and energies to healing work.
We can only wonder why Manning ceased to inform the public about life after death.
Maybe he was advised 'from beyond' that the information and powers provided him were not to be shared with the masses?
Maybe he tired of being a circus freak, required to perform endlessly and ultimately to be subjected to accusations of fraud (as has occurred to so
many others)?
Maybe he was warned by science, organised religion, etc. to 'shut up' or else?
He was studied by researchers in the US and Europe, as was Uri Geller. At the time, certain researchers acknowledged that both Manning and Geller
possessed 'abilities' for which science had no explanation.
All through history there have been individuals in all corners of the globe, who've had extraordinary abilities and knowledge. And while organised
religion takes a very strong interest in these people, very little is revealed to the masses.
Those who 'know too much' are regarded as a threat by those who wield the power. For this reason, those who know most -- say little. They tend to
shun the limelight and seek isolation. It may be their natural inclination. Or it may be in the interests of their own survival.
Knowledge is power and those who hold power are usually highly reluctant to share it. For this reason, we the masses are fed only what the powerful
wish us to know and believe. And for this reason, we will probably only learn by accident (or divine plan) what truths are there to be learned.
The most wise usually seek a humble life of meditation and good works. Most of them advocate detachment during our mortal existence as the path via
which we might strive to attain 'bliss' after physical death. Detachment from the ego, from material things, from emotional attachments, etc.
For most of us, this is the opposite of what we wish to hear. We have a difficult time dealing with the news we will become 'nothing' after death
-- that (if we're lucky) we'll discard our personality and meld with the universal whole.
Instead, we seek reassurance that we (and those we love) will continue to 'be ourselves' after death, albeit minus a physical body. We cling to the
hope and belief that after death, we'll join our loved ones in a paradise very similar to our current lives, but minus the pain, the violence, the
unpleasantness, etc.
So, maybe we're not ready to receive whatever knowledge the wise-ones have to impart. Which is maybe why they don't bother pressing such
information upon us. Pearls before swine, maybe?
Whatever the case, when we're ready, we'll know ourselves.
Doesn't prevent our being curious and interested, though