Odd, aerial object above power poles near construction site
in May 2006, in Birmingham, Alabama. Photo by Mr. Smith.
---------------------------------More at www.earthfiles.com...
May 25, 2007 Sequoia National Park, California, and Birmingham, Alabama - As the intensity has risen this week to explain away the Lake Tahoe,
Capitola and Central California Chad images as Photoshop and/or "viral promotional films," I have interviewed a California resident who worked for
the state government in the Department of Developmental Services in mental health for twenty-five years before recently retiring in 2006. Shirley was
born in Ventura County, California, and earned her Psychiatric Technician degree from Ventura Community College in 1978. I have her full address,
contact information and academic background, but she has applied to work in another state agency, so has asked to simply be identified as Shirley from
the Central Valley of California. She does not want the chaos surrounding the images to affect her new employment. But she wanted the public to know
that the Chad photos match a dragonfly-like aerial object she saw two years ago.
In May 2005, she went on a weekend trip with her father to visit Sequoia National Park. Shirley and her father were near the center of the large
Sequoia park and monument where they had planned to camp. But Shirley began feeling nauseous with a bad headache and decided she needed to go home and
rest. It was late afternoon between 3 to 5 PM, when she realized she was lost and did not know what road to take out of the park. She had stopped at a
park ranger station to ask a uniformed ranger for directions when she was shocked to see what looked like a big dragonfly moving in the sky. When
Shirley saw Chad’s photos at Earthfiles.com and the Coast to Coast AM website, she recognized the object as what she had seen.
Shirley, Retired California Department of Developmental Services Mental Health Technician, Central Valley, California: “It was around May of 2005.
And we had gotten lost about what road to take out of the Sequoias to get back on the right road heading home. I told my dad (now deceased), ‘Pull
over. I’m going to talk with the Park Ranger and see if he can help us.’
Came over talking to this ranger. And while talking, this weird thing flew overhead. Never seen anything like it in my whole life!
I asked the Park Ranger, ‘What is that?’ And he very casually just went, ‘Oh, yeah, I’m told it’s some kind of communications device. It’s
supposed to help the Park Service to monitor any possible problems like fires and such.’ That was pretty much his total explanation of what it
was.
-----------------------------------------
This is just getting ridiculous! I refuse to believe in this photoshopped BS! Take a video next time instead of pictures! (This is getting absolutely
crazy!)
Yeah and since interviewing her, Linda Howe is adamant that this lady is as "honest as the day is long." The lady supposedly said that the Park
Ranger never even looked up if she remembered correctly. Linda Howe said that she believed this uniformed man was some sort of prop meant to deflect
questions and plant disinformation. I listened to the C2C interview and I have to say that the lady did sound authentic.
Originally posted by fooffstarr
This 'new' image has already been debunked in the ongoing thread as CGI.
No, it isn't assumed to be, it is. It is an unskinned, gray 3D render... and a very poor one at that.
Oh really? I left that thread after about 5 pages and 50 posts by people who believed it was real. I could't stand it. It was blasphemy, it was
madness. But then I remembered, THIS IS ABOVETOPSECRET.COM!
Originally posted by Cydonian Priest
Oh really? I left that thread after about 5 pages and 50 posts by people who believed it was real.
Indeed.
I am 100% sure it is a fake. If David and Jritzmann both say it then that is more than enough for me, but there are so many people that seem to
need these things to be real that they are blind to the evidence infront of them.
This image you posted showed up a few days back and even looking at it now, with a meager 4 months Photoshop and Maya experience, i can see it is a
really badly done 3D render.
Oh, and that video... That Linda person that everyone keeps going on about believed it to be real... and made a big deal about it... until she was
proved wrong. I don't even know who she is but it might mean something to you.
I was always a strong believer in this being pure [SNIP]! It looks horrible! But the amount of believers just increased as the pictures did. I
just stuck my head in the ground and hoped it would pass by, but it didn't. Good to hear somebody is setting these people straight.
This picture is very unimpressive compared to the others.
But gray render or not, its COMPLETELY different. Its not even close in design, other than having a circle and something sticking out. Its probably
just another one of those oooh-the-original-is-3D-look-I-make-one-too guys.
Wow, poeple are still going around thinking that video is real, good job LMH, she may has pesonaly, in C2C the other night, set back UFOology.
How bad is it that she says such things like, "This is Definatly not Animation", while just a mere few cm from the video that must of sent her into
a frenzy, OMG, this is real wow, OMG, look at this pic from ALB, it must be real.
There is not an objective bone in her body, but in this case, she didn't need to be objective, she just needed to READ the info given. So what we now
know is LMH does not follow up her leads, not even a little bit, not even reading the information given with the video.
So if won't check the info presented with th esource, what can we expecgt from her, how can we belive a single word she says now, i used to listen to
her very closelyt on C2C, but im sorry, this was journilistic Suicide for LMH, i odn't think she could work for the enquier after this.
This video was made by SaladFingers who openly stated he did it to see what it would look like, he never once indicated or wanted anyone to think it
was real. It's very unfortunate LMH got duped by such an obvious experiment but alas, she did.
All of this has been discussed in the "big thread".