is 911 conspiracy just a disinfo on the IRAQ war?

Lets pretend we know nothing about 911 being an inside job for a second.

Is it possible the government simply allowed this attack on 911 to happen so Bush could invade Iraq. Is that where the most likely conspiracy really is?

I mean we seem to forget to ask the question of what do they have to gain all the time. The gain is the oil.

If Bush knew in advance of the 911 attack and he got advise from Cheney to let it happen as the new Pearl harbor to con the world into accepting a US invasion of Iraq, doesn't that make sense that they could be planting disinfo about the 911 attacks being fake just to stop us from seeing the larger and much more in your face conspiracy of the Iraq war?

It was used to catapult the whole "War on Terror", not just any one particular war. It opened up the possibility for war on any country in the Mid-East at the time. Now if they tried to invade another country, they'd get hell for it for a lack of justification, unless something else goes down, because most people know by now that countries like Iran and Syria had absolutely nothing to do with it.

I think they needed it for the economy, too, though. Not just for oil, but for Wall Street. A guy named Mike Ruppert, former narcotics criminal investigator for the LAPD if I'm not mistaken, made a strong case for this years ago, and the presentation's still on Google video somewhere. Pretty much it comes down to a lot of illegal drug trafficking going to support our economy (this has been going on for years), and the Taliban in Afghanistan was eliminating their opium fields the summer before our invasion. Now production is back through the roof. So there was an immediate need at the time, because our economy is doing poorly when you look beyond the big numbers they keep flashing on TV. This is case Mike Ruppert makes with a lot of documentation, if you can find the video on Google.

You should read this document published IN 2000 by the PNAC (THE Neo-con "think tank")

www.newamericancentury.org...

and do a little research on their agenda and who they are... you will then realize what you have posted here was "a New Pearl Harbor" and that "absent this catalyzing event" their agenda would have taken a LONG time... Their words.

Agenda (read between the lines): "“[What we require is] a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities."

So they want more military and pre-emptive strike "powers"....

Foreknowledge/Planning: (Page 63)

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

So, they want major military reform, but the process "will be a long one" MINUS 9/11 or "A New Pearl Harbour"... Interesting....

It i's not just oil:

- FIRST STRIKE: 9/11 + Terrorists gave Bush "pre-emptive strike capabilities ANYWHERE he wants/wanted WITHOUT congresional approval... this is a HUGE deviation from traditional American Foregin Policy and something the PNAC desperately wanted.

- STRATEGIC POSTIONING: We now have foreward operating bases in Afghanistan and Iraq. this allows us to "reach out and touch" ANYONE in the area quickly... ART of WAR. The PNAC outlines this strategy in the ablve linked document.

- CONTROL (home and abroad) : Patriot act + the first two items.

- MONEY: RESOURCES and MILITARY DOLLARS to contractors in which MANY members of the PNAC seem to be heavily invested (Raytheon, Halliburton, etc.)

- PUBLIC BACKING OF ALL OF THE ABOVE... thanks 9/11...

I am sure there are MANY reasons I am leaving out... but read their document, all of it and you might be shocked at the fact that they published that in the first place.

EDIT... here are just three of their stated goals from the 90pg "plan":

Global missile defenses. A network against limited strikes, capable of
protecting the United States, its allies and forward-deployed forces, must be
constructed. This must be a layered system of land, sea, air and spacebased
components.

• Control of space and cyberspace.
Much as control of the high seas – and the protection of international
commerce – defined global powers in the past, so will control of the new
“international commons” be a key to world power in the future. An
America incapable of protecting its interests or that of its allies in space
or the “infosphere” will find it difficult to exert global political
leadership.

• Pursuing a two-stage strategy for of transforming conventional forces. In exploiting the “revolution in military affairs,” the Pentagon must be driven by the enduring missions for U.S. forces. This process will have two stages: transition, featuring a mix of current and new systems; and true transformation, featuring new systems, organizations and operational concepts. This process must take a competitive approach, with services and joint-service operations competing for new roles and missions. Any sccessful process of transformation must be linked to the services, which are the institutions within the Defense Department with the ability and the esponsibility for linking budgets and resources to specific missions.

Wow... that is a LOT of control (freedom?) and a LOT of $$$ for the military to "lose" like they "lost" $2 TRILLION and announced it on 9/10/2001 (thanks again 9/11).




[edit on 30-4-2007 by Pootie]

[edit on 30-4-2007 by Pootie]

The elites makes endless money while we slave away for them and make little to no money at all.

Bad economy for a country is a victory for them because the reason why it's bad for us is because it's good for them.

And it's part of a world domination plan that is under way right now, basically the world is being controlled right now, it's not a matter of when it's a matter of now.

But the spell they casted is coming to an end and we are feeling the results of the fury of the storm, they are desperate now and about to be extinct.

Originally posted by Pootie ... you will then realize what you have posted here was "a New Pearl Harbor" and that "absent this catalyzing event" their agenda would have taken a LONG time... Their words.

This becomes even more apparent when you realise that Roosevelt engineered the attacks on Pearl Harbor by deliberately provoking the Japanese.

Originally posted by coughymachine

Originally posted by Pootie ... you will then realize what you have posted here was "a New Pearl Harbor" and that "absent this catalyzing event" their agenda would have taken a LONG time... Their words.

This becomes even more apparent when you realise that Roosevelt engineered the attacks on Pearl Harbor by deliberately provoking the Japanese.

I have a hard enough time getting people to READ and UNDERSTAND what was written by the Neo-cons in 2000 (an admission letter WITH motives) much less trying to convince them that Pearl harbor was probably allowed to happen to allow our entrance into WWII where AGAIN they needed PUBLIC SENTIMENT.

It's the oldest trick in the book of the governments.

Attack your self and blame it on who ever serves your agenda...

All the elements are in place, money, greed, power, no remorse for human life.