Hillary Clinton Raises Possibility of Attacking Iran.

Hillary Clinton Raises Possibility of Attacking Iran.

www.jpost.com.../JPArticle/ShowFull

Apr. 26, 2007 1:26 | Updated Apr. 26, 2007 11:27
Clinton: US might have to confront Iran
By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER
WASHINGTON

Democratic presidential candidate and New York Senator Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that it might be necessary for America to confront Iran militarily, addressing that possibility more directly than any of the other presidential candidates who spoke this week to the National Jewish Democratic Council.

Clinton first said that the US should be engaging directly with Iran to foil any effort to gain nuclear weapons and faulted the Bush administration for "considerably narrowing" the options available to America in countering Iran.

Still, she said, all avenues should be explored, since "if we do have to take offensive military action against Iran, it would be far better if the rest of the world saw it as a position of last resort, not first resort, because the effect and consequences will be global."

```````````````````````
Trimmed big quote and added 'ex' tags

Please read Posting work written by others

www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 26/4/07 by masqua]

So much for Democrats taking a different approach in the WOT.

That shows you were the Democrat head is...Attacking poor Iran.... VOTE REPUBLICAN.....

[edit on 26-4-2007 by KonigKaos]

Not surprising really, considering that Iran constitutes a greater threat than Iraq ever did. At least we know they are developing nuclear weapons capabilities if not nuclear weapons. Plus, they are militant in their stance toward Israel.

Their all in the same boat. Democrats and Republicans

Were just following them down the cold river.

Originally posted by ^ICEMAN^
So much for Democrats taking a different approach in the WOT.

Dude, Hillary will say whatever she needs to gain a larger support base, she paints herself as a "moderate" democrat but we all know that aint the case. Shes still the same 60's radical she always has been, just trying to project a different image to win votes. She still cant win though.

Why does she not attack north corea then?
In comparation unlike Iran, North corea stated they want nuclear weapons, and tested nuclear weapons, I don't see any one attacking north corea.
I guess it's not really nuclear weapons that they are worried about, it's just gaining influence in the middle east.

I don't understand how she can actually, in one breath, support both surrender in Iraq and a new war against Iran.

It makes no sense to me whatsoever.

She makes no sense. OMG> I hope we don't have the Clintons back in office.

They did enough damage to our country the first time around.

My guess is if they come back in it's to finish off what they started.

However, by them making friends with Bush and him being to stupid to see he was being USED. Just going along with everything the Clintons told him to do, has brought us into the shape were in.

Like I said they are all in the SAME BOAT.

It's like they are trying to play good cop, bad cop with the America people.

Some how it is working cause they are keeping us divided the way they want too.

[edit on 29-4-2007 by Shar]

Hilllary has always been a hawk.
She was also a major supporter of the invasion of Iraq.

I don't understand why she has so much support among Democrats - ideologically she's closer to a neocon than she is to most people on the "left."

so her stance vote for me and i will send more of the countries service men and women to die for another worthless cause.

reason i say worthless

Afgan= Drugs are on the increase and so are taliban attacks
Iraq=Secterain violance

Am I the only one that noticed that she was addressing a primarily Jewish audience? The name of the game is vote harvesting. I am sure that the "problem" of a nuclear Iran is on most Israeli's minds & those of Jewish heritage.

Am I the only one that noticed that she was addressing a primarily Jewish audience? The name of the game is vote harvesting. I am sure that the "problem" of a nuclear Iran is on most Israeli's minds & those of Jewish heritage.

Originally posted by mizzu
Am I the only one that noticed that she was addressing a primarily Jewish audience? The name of the game is vote harvesting. I am sure that the "problem" of a nuclear Iran is on most Israeli's minds & those of Jewish heritage.

dont the jews in the US have a voting loby which can swing votes?
for a small minority they have a huge say and feck loads of power in the US